4.5 Article

Insight Into Advance Care Planning for Patients on Dialysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 104-113

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.01.010

Keywords

Chronic renal failure; end-stage renal disease; advance directives; advance care planning; life-sustaining treatment preferences; communication

Funding

  1. Proteion Thuis, Horn, The Netherlands
  2. Center of Expertise for Chronic Organ Failure (CIRO+), Horn, The Netherlands
  3. Netherlands Asthma Foundation, Leusden, The Netherlands [3.4.06.082]
  4. Weijerhorst Foundation, Maastricht, The Netherlands
  5. Stichting Wetenschapsbevordering Verpleeghuiszorg (SWBV), Utrecht, The Netherlands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Advance care planning is not included in regular clinical care for patients on dialysis. Insight into life-sustaining treatment preferences and communication about end-of-life care is necessary to develop interventions to improve advance care planning for patients on dialysis. Objectives. This cross-sectional observational study aimed to understand the preferences for life-sustaining treatments of outpatients on dialysis and to study the quality of patient-physician communication about end-of-life care and barriers and facilitators to this communication. Methods. The following outcomes were assessed in 80 clinically stable dialysis patients: demographics, clinical characteristics, life-sustaining treatment preferences (cardiopulmonary resuscitation and mechanical ventilation, and Willingness to Accept Life-Sustaining Treatment instrument), preference for site of death, quality of communication (Quality of Communication Questionnaire), and barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life care (Barriers and Facilitators Questionnaire). Results. Patients were able to indicate their preferences for life-sustaining treatments and site of death. Preferences for life-sustaining treatments depend on the specific treatment, the expected outcome of treatment, and likelihood of an adverse outcome. Life-sustaining preferences were discussed with the nephrologist by 30.3% of the patients. Quality of the patient-physician communication about end-of-life care was rated poor. This study identified several barriers and facilitators to end-of-life care communication. Conclusion. Patients should receive information about treatment burden, expected outcome, and the likelihood of an adverse outcome when discussing life-sustaining treatments. Quality of patient-physician communication about end-of-life care needs to improve. Barriers and facilitators to communication about end-of-life care provide direction for future interventions to facilitate advance care planning for patients on dialysis. J Pain Symptom Manage 2013;45:104-113. (C) 2013 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available