4.5 Article

Palliative Sedation in Advanced Cancer Patients Followed at Home: A Retrospective Analysis

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN AND SYMPTOM MANAGEMENT
Volume 43, Issue 6, Pages 1126-1130

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2011.06.027

Keywords

Palliative sedation; end of life; palliative care; home care

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context. Data regarding palliative sedation at home in dying patients are lacking. Objectives. To describe the frequency, indication, and modality of palliative sedation (PS) in patients followed at home. Methods. A retrospective analysis of home care cancer patients was performed. Patients who received PS before dying were selected and information about epidemiologic characteristics, indications, duration, drugs, and outcomes was collected. Results. Of 370 medical charts of patients who died at home, 49 patients received PS before dying. PS was proposed by the team, relatives, or both in 63.3%, 4.1%, and 32.6% of cases, respectively. Delirium alone or in combination with other symptoms was the most frequent indication to begin PS. Midazolam was the most frequently used drug to initiate PS (98%), at a mean dose of 28.1 mg/day, in combination with parenteral morphine (84.7%) at a mean dose of 25.4 mg/day. At the time of death, midazolam was administered in 98% of patients (mean dose 22.3 mg/day), combined with parenteral morphine in 87.8% of patients (mean dose 28.1 mg/day). Satisfaction for physicians and principal caregivers after PS was good in 46 and 48 cases, respectively. Conclusion. PS at home seems to be a feasible treatment option among selected patients and makes a potentially important contribution to improving care for those who choose to die at home. J Pain Symptom Manage 2012; 43: 1126-1130. (C) 2012 U.S. Cancer Pain Relief Committee. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available