4.4 Article

A Principal Components Analysis of Negative Affect-Related Constructs Relevant to Pain: Evidence for a Three Component Structure

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAIN
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages 710-717

Publisher

CHURCHILL LIVINGSTONE
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.10.014

Keywords

Pain; Factor Analysis; Assessment; Fear; Anxiety

Funding

  1. Psychology Department, University of Bath

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A number of negative affect-related constructs are important in pain. Some are general, such as anxiety, depression and negative affectivity, whereas others are more specifically pain-related (eg, fear of pain, pain anxiety, and pain catastrophizing). In addition, some more specific fear-related constructs, such as anxiety sensitivity, illness/injury sensitivity, and fear of negative evaluation have emerged as important to pain. Although these various constructs are considered conceptually separate, there is likely to be overlap between them. Since the extent of this overlap is unknown, the aim of the current study was to investigate these constructs in 1 sample in order to identify their common and unique features. Frequently used psychological measures were completed by 508 pain-free participants. Principal components analysis resulted in the extraction of three components: 1) General distress; 2) Fear of pain from injury/insult; and 3) Cognitive intrusion of pain. The results presented here suggest that there is indeed commonality between constructs, which may be due to either an overlap between items within measures or to close conceptual relatedness. The implications of these core dimensions are discussed with reference to future research and theory. Perspective: This article explores the relationships between various negative-affect pain-related measures and discusses the results from a principal components analysis. The findings show that some questionnaires may measure the same latent construct. A measure could be developed to measure these 3 core components more concisely for both clinical and research purposes. (C) 2010 by the American Pain Society

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Rheumatology

It's Not My Knee: Understanding Ongoing Pain and Discomfort After Total Knee Replacement Through Re-Embodiment

Andrew Moore, Christopher Eccleston, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Summary: This study investigated the role of embodiment and incorporation in understanding experiences of pain and discomfort after total knee replacement surgery. The findings showed that some patients did not fully accept the prosthetic joint and felt a lack of connection and control over it. The study highlights the importance of treating patients as whole individuals and focusing on modifying their relationship with the new joint to achieve optimal postoperative outcomes.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2022)

Article Rheumatology

Screening to Identify Postoperative Pain and Cross-Sectional Associations Between Factors Identified in This Process With Pain and Function, Three Months After Total Knee Replacement

Vikki Wylde, Emily Sanderson, Tim J. Peters, Wendy Bertram, Nicholas Howells, Julie Bruce, Christopher Eccleston, Rachael Gooberman-Hill

Summary: This study described the screening and recruitment process of a randomized trial and evaluated the associations between knee pain and function 3 months after total knee replacement (TKR). The results showed that the severity of pain after TKR was associated with overall health, physical health, pain worry, and satisfaction with surgery outcomes. Functional limitation was associated with depression, pain worry, satisfaction with surgery outcomes, and pain acceptance.

ARTHRITIS CARE & RESEARCH (2022)

Review Anesthesiology

Efficacy and safety of pharmacological, physical, and psychological interventions for the management of chronic pain in children: a WHO systematic review and meta-analysis

Emma Fisher, Gemma Villanueva, Nicholas Henschke, Sarah J. Nevitt, William Zempsky, Katrin Probyn, Brian Buckley, Tess E. Cooper, Navil Sethna, Christopher Eccleston

Summary: Chronic pain in childhood is a global public health issue. A systematic review and meta-analysis were conducted to summarize the evidence of pharmacological, physical, and psychological therapies for children with chronic pain. Psychological therapy was found to be the most effective method in managing pain.
Review Anesthesiology

Benefit-risk assessment and reporting in clinical trials of chronic pain treatments: IMMPACT recommendations

Bethea A. Kleykamp, Robert H. Dworkin, Dennis C. Turk, Zubin Bhagwagar, Penney Cowan, Christopher Eccleston, Susan S. Ellenberg, Scott R. Evans, John T. Farrar, Roy L. Freeman, Louis P. Garrison, Jennifer S. Gewandter, Veeraindar Goli, Smriti Iyengar, Alejandro R. Jadad, Mark P. Jensen, Roderick Junor, Nathaniel P. Katz, J. Patrick Kesslak, Ernest A. Kopecky, Dmitri Lissin, John D. Markman, Michael P. McDermott, Philip J. Mease, Alec B. O'Connor, Kushang Patel, Srinivasa N. Raja, Michael C. Rowbotham, Cristina Sampaio, Jasvinder A. Singh, Ilona Steigerwald, Vibeke Strand, Leslie A. Tive, Jeffrey Tobias, Ajay D. Wasan, Hilary D. Wilson

Summary: Chronic pain clinical trials have traditionally assessed benefit and risk outcomes separately. However, recent research suggests that a composite metric that considers both benefit and risk together can offer valuable insights into treatment effects. This article, based on expert opinions from a consensus meeting, reviews the use of benefit-risk assessment tools in published chronic pain clinical trials. The review finds that these metrics are underutilized in such trials, and proposes that they should be applied at both individual and group levels of analysis to better understand the relationship between benefits and risks in different patient subpopulations. The systematic assessment of benefit-risk has the potential to enhance the clinical relevance of randomized clinical trial results.
Review Anesthesiology

Pain, work, and the workplace: a topical review

Elaine Wainwright, Steven Bevan, Fiona M. Blyth, Saman Khalatbari-Soltani, Michael J. L. Sullivan, Karen Walker-Bone, Christopher Eccleston

Review Anesthesiology

Systematic reviews do not (yet) represent the 'gold standard' of evidence: A position paper

Robert Andrew Moore, Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston

Summary: This article points out the problems that exist in current systematic reviews, including low-quality trials, insufficient rigor in review methodology, ignorance of key pain issues, small sample sizes, and over-optimistic judgments about treatment effects. The authors argue that the majority of systematic reviews have fatal flaws and only a small percentage have adequate methods and clinical usefulness, therefore their results should be dismissed. The authors call for critical systematic reviews to improve trial quality and advocate for their encouragement and protection.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PAIN (2022)

Article Anesthesiology

Investigating the veracity of a sample of divergent published trial data in spinal pain

Neil E. O'Connell, R. Andrew Moore, Gavin Stewart, Emma Fisher, Leslie Hearn, Christopher Eccleston, Amanda C. de C. Williams

Summary: This study systematically examined multiple related trials from the same author to investigate the bias risk, governance procedures, and trustworthiness of the research. The results revealed significant differences between some of the trial results and the existing evidence, and the explanations provided by the author were not satisfactory. The study further identified issues related to research governance, data plausibility, results, and data duplication. These findings decrease the trustworthiness of the trials.
Article Clinical Neurology

Comparing the Effects of Thought Suppression and Focused Distraction on Pain-Related Attentional Biases in Men and Women

Nina Kreddig, Monika Ilona Hasenbring, Edmund Keogh

Summary: Increasing attentional focus away from pain can affect pain experience, and cognitive strategies can help with pain by changing attention allocation. This study examined the effects of two cognitive strategies, thought suppression and focused distraction, on pain-related attention and found that these strategies did not influence pain-related attention, but thought suppression had short-term benefits in terms of pain and perceived threat.

JOURNAL OF PAIN (2022)

Review Anesthesiology

Flawed, futile, and fabricateddfeatures that limit confidence in clinical research in pain and anaesthesia: a narrative review

Andrew Moore, Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston

Summary: The randomised controlled trial, the foundation of clinical research, is often flawed in design, conduct, and reporting, leading to concerns about its trustworthiness. Common flaws include bias, small sample sizes, irrelevant outcomes, and inability to detect efficacy. Some trials have been fabricated, with the fields of anaesthesia and pain having a larger number. This review highlights the need for special measures to improve the quality and confidence of clinical evidence.

BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA (2023)

Letter Health Care Sciences & Services

Effective quality control in the medical literature: investigation and retraction vs inaction

Amanda C. de C. Williams, Leslie Hearn, R. Andrew Moore, Gavin Stewart, Emma Fisher, Christopher Eccleston, Neil E. O'Connell

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY (2023)

Letter Anesthesiology

Reply to Monticone

Neil Edward O'Connell, R. Andrew Moore, Gavin Stewart, Emma Fisher, Leslie Hearn, Christopher Eccleston, Amanda C. de C. Williams

Review Anesthesiology

The establishment, maintenance, and adaptation of high- and low-impact chronic pain: a framework for biopsychosocial pain research

Christopher Eccleston, Emma Begley, Hollie Birkinshaw, Ernest Choy, Geert Crombez, Emma Fisher, Anna Gibby, Rachael Gooberman-Hill, Sharon Grieve, Amber Guest, Abbie Jordan, Amanda Lilywhite, Gary J. Macfarlane, Candida McCabe, John McBeth, Anthony E. Pickering, Tamar Pincus, Hannah M. Sallis, Samantha Stone, Danielle Van der Windt, Diego Vitali, Elaine Wainwright, Colin Wilkinson, Amanda C. de C. Williams, Anica Zeyen, Edmund Keogh

Article Computer Science, Software Engineering

The Design and Development of an Embodied Semi-Autonomous Mentoring Intelligence (SAMI) for Use in Virtual Reality Interventions, Operationalized for the Self-Management of Chronic Pain

J. Bartlett, E. Fisher, S. Liikkanen, J. Turunen, M. Skog, C. Eccleston

Summary: This study presents a new embodied Semi-Autonomous Mentoring Intelligence (SAMI) avatar used in an immersive virtual reality intervention for chronic pain. The research findings provide insights on methods to establish working alliance with non-human agents, optimal characteristics of non-human agents, and features of effective automation.

FRONTIERS IN VIRTUAL REALITY (2022)

No Data Available