4.2 Article

Vitamin D status and its predictors among pre-school children in Adelaide

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH
Volume 51, Issue 6, Pages 614-619

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jpc.12770

Keywords

deficiency; predictor; pre-school child; vitamin D status; 25(OH)D

Categories

Funding

  1. Wyeth Nutritional International
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council Senior Research Fellowship [519324, 565000]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo assess vitamin D status and its predictors in a representative population sample of pre-school children in Adelaide (latitude of 35 degrees S). MethodsCross-sectional survey of children aged between 1 and 5 years from areas of low, medium and high socio-economic status as identified from the 2001 Census data, Australian Bureau of Statistics. Children were recruited between September 2005 and July 2007 using a door knocking protocol based on a stratified sampling method to obtain a representative sample of this age group. Serum 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25(OH)D) was determined using a radio-immunoassay kit. Vitamin D deficiency was defined as serum 25(OH)D) <30nmol/L and insufficiency defined as serum 25(OH)D 30 and <50nmol/L according to the Institute of Medicine. ResultsFifty-two per cent of eligible children took part in the study. Mean (standard deviation) serum 25(OH)D was 73 (26)nmol/L (n=221). The prevalence of vitamin D deficiency and insufficiency was 4% and 16%, respectively, with the prevalence being higher in winter (8% and 22%, respectively). Season of the year of blood collection and mother being born in Australia were significant predictors of serum 25(OH)D concentration, but age, sex, socio-economic status, BMI category or dietary supplement use were not related to vitamin D status. ConclusionsVitamin D status of this representative sample of pre-school children in Australia is adequate, and the prevalence of vitamin D deficiency is low based on the Institute of Medicine criteria.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available