4.2 Article

Respiratory syncytial virus immunoprophylaxis in high-risk infants with heart disease

Journal

JOURNAL OF PAEDIATRICS AND CHILD HEALTH
Volume 48, Issue 5, Pages 395-401

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2011.02219.x

Keywords

bronchiolitis; congenital heart disease; palivizumab; respiratory syncytial virus

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: Passive immunisation with palivizumab is recommended in many countries for children with haemodynamically significant cardiac disease. We trialled respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) immunoprophylaxis in such infants during 20082009. Methods: We identified all RSV admissions between 20052009 and examined all patients with significant cardiac disease who received palivizumab in 20082009. Results: Infants with symptomatic cardiac disease had a more complicated course of RSV bronchiolitis with longer hospital stay, more frequent intensive care admission, longer intensive care stay and were more likely to receive respiratory support (all P < 0.05). One hundred seventeen infants with symptomatic cardiac disease received palivizumab. Of these, two (1.7%) required admission for RSV bronchiolitis. Overall, there was a reduction in admission of infants with symptomatic cardiac disease with RSV bronchiolitis in 20082009 (2% per year) compared with 20052007 (59% per year; P < 0.03). The number of patients with symptomatic cardiac disease who required intensive care for RSV bronchiolitis in the same period was unchanged, as a number presented to our service with RSV infection prior to commencing immunoprophylaxis or having had their cardiac diagnosis made in other centres. Conclusions: Compared with other infants, those with haemodynamically significant cardiac disease have a more complicated course of illness with RSV bronchiolitis. In these infants, palivizumab reduced the number of hospitalisations because of RSV. Cohorting patients for maximal palivizumab use reduced overall cost. To significantly impact on intensive care admissions overall, immunoprophylaxis should be considered at a regional level.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available