4.3 Article

The McGill simulator for endoscopic sinus surgery (MSESS): a validation study

Journal

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s40463-014-0040-8

Keywords

Rhinology; Endoscopic sinus surgery; Training; Education; Simulation; Virtual reality; Resident; Minimally invasive surgery; Haptic; Technical abilities; Performance metrics; Nasal model

Funding

  1. Franco Di Giovanni Foundation
  2. B-Strong Foundation
  3. Tony Colannino Foundation
  4. English Montreal School Board
  5. Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital
  6. McGill Head & Neck Cancer Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) is a technically challenging procedure, associated with a significant risk of complications. Virtual reality simulation has demonstrated benefit in many disciplines as an important educational tool for surgical training. Within the field of rhinology, there is a lack of ESS simulators with appropriate validity evidence supporting their integration into residency education. The objectives of this study are to evaluate the acceptability, perceived realism and benefit of the McGill Simulator for Endoscopic Sinus Surgery (MSESS) among medical students, otolaryngology residents and faculty, and to present evidence supporting its ability to differentiate users based on their level of training through the performance metrics. Methods: 10 medical students, 10 junior residents, 10 senior residents and 3 expert sinus surgeons performed anterior ethmoidectomies, posterior ethmoidectomies and wide sphenoidotomies on the MSESS. Performance metrics related to quality (e.g. percentage of tissue removed), efficiency (e.g. time, path length, bimanual dexterity, etc.) and safety (e.g. contact with no-go zones, maximum applied force, etc.) were calculated. All users completed a post-simulation questionnaire related to realism, usefulness and perceived benefits of training on the MSESS. Results: The MSESS was found to be realistic and useful for training surgical skills with scores of 7.97 +/- 0.29 and 8.57 +/- 0.69, respectively on a 10-point rating scale. Most students and residents (29/30) believed that it should be incorporated into their curriculum. There were significant differences between novice surgeons (10 medical students and 10 junior residents) and senior surgeons (10 senior residents and 3 sinus surgeons) in performance metrics related to quality (p < 0.05), efficiency (p < 0.01) and safety (p < 0.05). Conclusion: The MSESS demonstrated initial evidence supporting its use for residency education. This simulator may be a potential resource to help fill the void in endoscopic sinus surgery training.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available