4.3 Article

Secretory osteocalcin as a nondestructive osteogenic marker of tissue-engineered bone

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC SCIENCE
Volume 16, Issue 5, Pages 622-628

Publisher

SPRINGER TOKYO
DOI: 10.1007/s00776-011-0121-8

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The constructs of mesenchymal stem cells and ceramics form bone tissue after implantation. Therefore, the constructs can include cultured bone (tissue-engineered bone) as bone grafts. However, the selection of constructs, prior to implantation, with high osteogenic potential is still difficult. We used a rat model to measure the secretory osteocalcin level in culture medium to verify that monitoring osteocalcin levels enables the selection of constructs with high osteogenic potential. We prepared constructs of rat hydroxyapatite/cells and used different cell passages of P-1 and P-3 as well as different cell numbers: 1 x 10(5) and 1 x 10(6) cells/ml suspension. These constructs were cultured for 14 days under osteoinductive or nonosteoinductive conditions and implanted subcutaneously in the recipient rat. Secretory osteocalcin in the culture medium was measured using an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay system during the culture period until day 14, and the osteocalcin content of the harvested construct at 4 weeks was also measured. All constructs except the hydroxyapatite/P-3 construct showed abundant bone formation by histology and both high secretory osteocalcin level in the medium and high osteocalcin content after implantation. Our study revealed that secretory osteocalcin level in vitro was related to osteocalcin content in vivo. The study clearly showed that measuring secretory osteocalcin is a nondestructive method of assessing the osteogenic potential of tissue-engineered bone. One can choose tissue-engineered bone with high osteogenic potential by integrating secretory osteocalcin measurement into the process of bone-tissue regeneration.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available