4.5 Article

Alfacalcidol Enhances Collagen Quality in Ovariectomized Rat Bones

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 32, Issue 8, Pages 1030-1036

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.22642

Keywords

vitamin D; alfacalcidol; collagen; collagen cross-link; ovariectomized rats

Categories

Funding

  1. NIH-NIDCR/NIAMS (NIH-R21) [DE020909, AR060978]
  2. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [24592875] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The aim of this study was to investigate the effects of alfacalcidol (1 alpha(OH)D-3: ALF) on bone collagen employing an ovariectomized rat model. Thirty-five 16-week-old female Sprague-Dawley rats were divided into five groups: SHAM (sham-operated + vehicle), OVX (ovariectomy + vehicle), and three ALF-treated groups, that is, ovariectomy + 0.022 mu g/kg/day ALF, ovariectomy + 0.067 mu g/kg/day ALF, and ovariectomy + 0.2 mu g/kg/day ALF. After 12 weeks of treatment, tibiae were subjected to histological, biochemical and immunohistochemical analyses. Collagen matrices in OVX bone appeared as immature and poorly organized; however, with the ALF treatment, it was improved in a dose-dependent manner. Contents of collagen and pyridinoline cross-link were decreased in OVX compared with SHAM, but they increased to the level comparable to SHAM in ALF-treated groups. The total aldehyde, that is, a sum of free and those involved cross-links, in the highest dose of ALF was significantly higher than the rest of the groups (p < 0.05). In addition, the expression of lysyl oxidase was increased in the all ALF-treated groups compared with OVX (p < 0.05). In conclusion, ALF increases not only the amount of collagen but also enhances the maturation of collagen in ovariectomy-induced osteoporotic bones, which likely contributes to the improvement of bone quality. (C) 2014 The Authors. Journal of Orthopaedic Research. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available