4.5 Article

Effect of Loading on the Organization of the Collagen Fibril Network in Juvenile Equine Articular Cartilage

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORTHOPAEDIC RESEARCH
Volume 27, Issue 9, Pages 1226-1234

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jor.20866

Keywords

cartilage; collagen fibril; loading; parallelism; orientation

Categories

Funding

  1. Academy of Finland
  2. Ministry of Education Finland
  3. National Graduate School of Musculoskeletal Diseases Finland
  4. Science Foundation Ireland
  5. New Zealand Racing Board

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigated the effects of exercise-induced loading on the collagen network of equine articular cartilage. Collagen fibril architecture at a site (1) subjected to intermittent high-intensity loading was compared with that of an adjacent site (2) sustaining continuous low-level load. From horses exposed to forced exercise (CONDEX group) or not (PASTEX group), the spatial parallelism of fibrils and the orientation angle between fibrils and the surface at depths 9 mu m apart through cartilage from surface to tidemark were determined using polarized light microscopy, and expressed as parallelism index (PI) and orientation index (OI). PI was significantly higher in site 2 than I in CONDEX and PASTEX groups. PI was significantly higher in forced exercised horses at site 2 but not site 1. OI was significantly greater (more perpendicular to the surface) in the superficial and deep cartilage of site 2 than 1 in both CONDEX and PASTEX groups. Superficial zone OI was higher in exercised horses at site 1 but not at site 2. Exercise increased collagen parallelism and affected orientation. The site differences in OI indicate that Benninghoff's classic predominantly perpendicular arcades appear not to be a consistent architectural feature, but adapt to local forces sustained. (C) 2009 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 27:1226-1234, 2009

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available