4.3 Article

Salivary flow rate and clinical characteristics of patients with xerostomia according to its aetiology

Journal

JOURNAL OF ORAL REHABILITATION
Volume 37, Issue 3, Pages 185-193

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.02037.x

Keywords

xerostomia; salivary flow rate; aetiology

Funding

  1. Ministry for Health, Welfare & Family Affairs, Republic of Korea [A080035]
  2. Korea Health Promotion Institute [A080035] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

P>The purpose of the present study was to investigate the differences in salivary flow rates and dry mouth-related subjective symptoms and behaviours in patients with xerostomia according to its aetiology. One hundred and forty patients (24 men and 116 women, mean age, 58 center dot 1 +/- 13 center dot 3 years) with a chief complaint of xerostomia were included. The patients were divided into five groups; Sjogren's syndrome (n = 34), post-radiation therapy in the head and neck region (n = 16), antipsychotic medications (n = 30), systemic diseases or medications affecting salivary flow (n = 35), and unknown aetiology (n = 25). The patients were asked a standardized series of questions concerning dry mouth, and their whole salivary flow rates were measured. Patients with a history of radiation therapy displayed the most decreased values of salivary flow rates and the most severe associated symptoms and behaviours while patients with unknown aetiology displayed the least decreased values of salivary flow rates and relatively favourable symptoms and behaviours. A burning sensation in the mouth was the most prevalent in patients with systemic diseases or those who were taking medications while altered taste perception was the most prevalent in patients taking antipsychotics. In conclusion, patients with xerostomia displayed various degrees of discomfort related to the quality of life according to the aetiology of their conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available