4.2 Article

A Cross-Sectional Analysis of the Association Between Night-Only or Rotating Shift Work and Overweight/Obesity Among Female Nurses and Midwives

Journal

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/JOM.0b013e31824e1058

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Australian Research Council [LP0562102, SR0566924]
  2. Australian National Health and Medical Research Council [2005002108]
  3. New Zealand Health Research Council [456163]
  4. Queensland Health
  5. South Australian Department of Health, Injury Prevention and Control Australia (Pty Ltd)
  6. Nursing Council of New Zealand
  7. Macquarie Bank Foundation
  8. Virgin Blue
  9. Virgin Atlantic
  10. MessageNet
  11. Australian Research Council [SR0566924] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To examine the associations between shift work types and overweight/obesity among female nurses and midwives. Methods: A cross-sectional study. Measurement included exposure variables: rotating shift work and night-only shift work; outcome variables: overweight and obesity; and potential confounding and associated variables: modifiable lifestyle factors, general health status, menopausal status, and work pattern. Results: Among the 2086 participants, almost 60% were overweight/obese (31.7% overweight; 27.1% obese). After we adjusted the selected confounders, we found that rotating shift workers were 1.02 times more likely to be overweight/obese than day workers (P = 0.007; 95% confidence interval [95% Cl], 1.004 to 1.03; and P = 0.02; 95% CI: 1.004 to 1.04, respectively). Night-only shift work was found to be significantly associated with obesity only (P = 0.031; relative risk, 1.02; 95% CI, 1.002 to 1.04). Conclusions: Rotating shift work was associated with both overweight and obesity; and night-only shift work was associated with obesity, not overweight.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available