4.1 Article

A Pediatric Fruit and Vegetable Prescription Program Increases Food Security in Low-Income Households

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 51, Issue 2, Pages 224-+

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2018.08.003

Keywords

food security; fruit and vegetable prescription program; nutrition incentive programs

Funding

  1. Betty Irene Moore School of Nursing at University of California, Davis
  2. Laurie M. Tisch Illumination Fund
  3. New World Foundation
  4. Newman's Own Foundation
  5. Vincent J. Coates Foundation
  6. Sampson Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess change in household food security associated with participation in a pediatric fruit/ vegetable prescription program. Methods: The researchers analyzed clinic-based, fruit/vegetable prescription program data for 578 low-income families, collected in 2013-2015, and calculated changes in food security (summative score; high/low/very low; and individual US Department of Agriculture measures). Results: Of participating households, 72% increased their summative score over the course of the program. In adjusted regression models, participants had higher change scores with 5 or 6 clinical visits, compared with 1 or 2 visits (beta = .07; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.14), and college education of the primary caretaker, compared with less than college (beta = .05; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.09). Select clinic sites (but neither visit nor redemption proportions) significantly contributed to change score variance. All US Department of Agriculture measures saw significant increases. Conclusions and Implications: Fruit/vegetable prescription programs may help providers address patients' food insecurity. Further research using experimental designs and implementation science could build the case to incorporate programs into practice.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available