4.1 Article

Preschoolers Can Distinguish Between Healthy and Unhealthy Foods: The All 4 Kids Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION EDUCATION AND BEHAVIOR
Volume 46, Issue 2, Pages 121-127

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneb.2013.09.012

Keywords

preschoolers; nutrition education; health; intervention; food preference

Funding

  1. Cooperative State Research, Education, and Extension Service, United States Department of Agriculture [2010-85215-20662]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To determine changes in preschoolers' ability to distinguish between healthy and unhealthy foods and stated food preferences after participation in a nutrition education program. Design: Pre-post comparison/intervention study with sites clustered based on center size and language. Setting: Preschool classrooms. Participants: A total of 191 preschoolers from Nevada and 128 from Connecticut, New Jersey, and Oklahoma. Intervention: All 4 Kids, a 24-lesson program taught by trained instructors. Main Outcome Measures: Pre- and post-assessment sum scores for identifying 18 foods; stated preference for, and distinguishing between, healthy vs unhealthy choice from 9 food pairs using a newly designed tool. Analysis: t tests; multiple linear and logistic regression models. Results: There was a statistically significant improvement in identification scores from pre- to post-study for both groups from Nevada (P < .001). For preference and distinguishing between healthy and unhealthy foods, no differences were noted at pretest. At posttest, significantly more intervention than comparison preschoolers indicated a preference for healthier foods (P < .006) and an ability to distinguish them (P < .03). Outcome comparison between Nevada and 3 states demonstrated generalizability of the study tool. Conclusions and Implications: Participation in All 4 Kids resulted in preschoolers' increased understanding of healthy foods and changed their stated food preferences.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available