4.6 Article

Retinol and riboflavin supplementation decreases the prevalence of anemia in Chinese pregnant women taking iron and folic acid supplements

Journal

JOURNAL OF NUTRITION
Volume 138, Issue 10, Pages 1946-1950

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/jn/138.10.1946

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In rural China, many pregnant women in their third trimester suffer from anemia (48%) and iron deficiency 0 D; 42%), often with coexisting deficiencies of retinol and riboflavin. We investigated the effect of retinol and riboflavin supplementation in addition to iron plus folic acid on anemia and subjective well-being in pregnant women. The study was a 2-mo, double-blind, randomized trial. Subjects In 366) with anemia [hemoglobin (Hb) <= 105 g/L] were randomly assigned to 4 groups, all receiving 60 mg/d iron and 400 mu g/d folic acid. The iron+folic acid (IF) group (n = 93) served as reference, the iron+folic acid+retinol group (IFA) (n=91) was treated with 2000 mu g retinol, the iron+folic acid+riboflavin group (IFB) (n=91)with 1.0 mg riboflavin, and the iron+folic acid+retinol+riboflavin group (IFAB) in 91) with retinol and riboflavin. After the 2-mo intervention, the Hb concentration increased in all 4 groups (P < 0.001). The increase in the IFAB group was 5.4 +/- 11 g/L greater than in the IF group (P < 0.001). The reduced prevalence of anemia (Hb < 110g/L) and 1D anemia were significantly greater in the groups supplemented with retinol and/or riboflavin than in the IF group. Moreover, gastrointestinal symptoms were less prevalent in the IFA group than in the IF group (P < 0.05) and improved well-being was more prevalent in the groups receiving additional retinol and/or riboflavin than in the IF group (P < 0.05). Thus, a combination of iron, folic acid, retinol, and riboflavin was more effective than iron plus folic acid alone. Multimicronutrient Supplementation may be worthwhile for pregnant women in rural China.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available