4.5 Article

Traumatic Brain Injury during Warfarin Anticoagulation: An Experimental Study in Mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROTRAUMA
Volume 29, Issue 6, Pages 1150-1155

Publisher

MARY ANN LIEBERT INC
DOI: 10.1089/neu.2011.2104

Keywords

animal studies; in vivo studies; models of injury; traumatic brain injury

Funding

  1. CSL Behring, Marburg, Germany

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The number of patients who are on long-term anticoagulation therapy while experiencing traumatic brain injury (TBI) is rising. This experimental study evaluated whether warfarin pre-treatment increases brain hemorrhage and worsens functional outcome after TBI, and whether the rapid reversal of anticoagulation after TBI prevents warfarin-exacerbated brain damage. Normal CD-1 mice (C) and mice pre-treated with warfarin (W) to an International Normalized Ratio of 3.5 +/- 0.9 underwent TBI using a controlled cortical impact model. Mean hemorrhage volume 24 h after TBI was 1.2 +/- 0.4 mu L in C mice and 10.9 +/- 6.9 mu L in W mice (p = 0.029, n = 4 per group). In a second study, anticoagulated mice received either saline (W-S) or prothrombin complex concentrate (W-PCC, 100 U/kg) intravenously 60 min after TBI. Anticoagulation reversal using PCC (W-PCC mice) reduced hemorrhage volumes as compared to W-S animals (7.3 +/- 6.0 versus 19.8 +/- 14.0 mu L, p = 0.045, n = 8 per group). In a third study, we examined motor deficits and lesion volume in C, W-S, and W-PCC mice until 33 days after injury. Functional outcome and lesion volume were no different between groups (n = 10 per group). In conclusion, we characterized an experimental model of TBI occurring during warfarin anticoagulation. Anticoagulation led to higher intracerebral blood volumes, but did not significantly worsen functional outcome. The rapid reversal of anticoagulation may be effective in preventing excess bleeding.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available