4.4 Article

Influence of thread design on pedicle screw fixation - Laboratory investigation

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSURGERY-SPINE
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 90-95

Publisher

AMER ASSOC NEUROLOGICAL SURGEONS
DOI: 10.3171/SPI/2008/9/7/090

Keywords

pedicle screw; pullout experiment; Sawbone; thread properties

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Object. The authors conducted a study to determine the thread properties that provide optimal screw fixation in cancellous bone, when screws of the same external screw diameter are used. Methods. Three compliance engineering-certified screws in clinical use, all of the same external diameter and length, were compared in an axial pullout experiment with respect to advantageous thread properties. As test material, standardized Sawbone blocks with 3 different densities (0.12, 0.16, and 0.32 g/cm(3)) were used. Results. Screw thread Type 1, whose flank overlap area (FOA; 261 mm(2)) results from narrowing the conical core in the thread area, showed significantly better holding strength than the other types. Screw thread Type 2 (FOA 326 mm(2)) with a conical but thicker core and a smaller thread pitch was found to be the only one without increase of pullout forces when test materials density changed from 0.12 to 0.16 g/cm(3). A screw tested as control, with a constant (cylindrical) core diameter (Type 3; FOA 206 mm(2)), had the same thread pitch as Type 1 but without the compressive effect on the surrounding bur hole wall material. Nevertheless, it showed higher pullout forces in the 0.16-g/cm(3) material than screw Type 2. Conclusions. By reducing the core diameter of a screw toward the tip, while maintaining a constant nominal (external) diameter, one achieves frictional connection due to compression of surrounding material. In addition, the FOA is increased, which, in summary, leads to better fixation, as shown by screw Type 1.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available