4.5 Article

Effects of Epidermal Growth Factor and Erythropoietin on Muller Glial Activation and Phenotypic Plasticity in the Adult Mammalian Retina

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 89, Issue 7, Pages 1018-1030

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22629

Keywords

mouse; transcription factors; glial reactivity; bromodeoxyuridine; retinal progenitor cells

Categories

Funding

  1. Department of Surgery, Dalhousie University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinal Muller glia have received considerable attention with regard to their potential to function as quiescent retinal precursors. Various activation strategies induce characteristic features of retinal progenitor cells in Muller glia; however, these are often accompanied by hallmark features of reactive gliosis. We investigated the effects of an intravitreal injection of epidermal growth factor (EGF), a known mitogen, and erythropoietin (EPO) on activation and expression of developmental phenotypes within the adult retina. Using thymidine-analogue labeling as well as immunocytochemical and confocal analyses, we assayed the responses of retinal cells exposed to intravitreal administration of either EGF or EPO. We report that adult Muller glia incorporate bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) and undergo a process of nuclear translocation to ectopic retinal layers following exposure to EGF. These cells survive within the retina for at least 23 days and express the developmental markers Pax6 and Chx10 as well as nestin and glial fibrillary acidic protein. Furthermore, we demonstrate that cotreatment with EGF and EPO suppresses aspects of EGF-induced glial reactivity, alters the retinal distribution of BrdU-positive nuclei, and serves to regulate the expression of developmental phenotypes seen in these cells. These data further our understanding of Muller cell responsiveness to intravitral, combinatorial growth factor treatments. (C) 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available