4.5 Article

Transgenic Mouse and Cell Culture Models Demonstrate a Lack of Mechanistic Connection Between Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Tau Dysfunction

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE RESEARCH
Volume 88, Issue 9, Pages 1951-1961

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jnr.22359

Keywords

unfolded protein response; Alzheimer's disease; SH-SY5Y; PS19; neurofibrillary tangles; paired helical filaments

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [F33 AG031610, R01 GM075297, P20 RR015588]
  2. National Science Foundation [DGE-0221651]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In vivo aggregation of tau protein is a hallmark of many neurodegenerative disorders, including Alzheimer's disease (AD). Recent evidence has also demonstrated activation of the unfolded protein response (UPR), a cellular response to endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, in AD, although the role of the UPR in disease pathogenesis is not known. Here, three model systems were used to determine whether a direct mechanistic link could be demonstrated between tau aggregation and the UPR. The first model system used was SH-SY5Y cells, a neuronal cultured cell line that endogenously expresses tau. In this system, the UPR was activated using chemical stressors, tunicamycin and thapsigargin, but no changes in tau expression levels, solubility, or phosphorylation were observed. In the second model system, wild-type 4R tau and P301L tau, a variant with increased aggregation propensity, were heterologously overexpressed in HEK 293 cells. This overexpression did not activate the UPR. The last model system examined here was the PS19 transgenic mouse model. Although PS19 mice, which express the P301S variant of tau, display severe neurodegeneration and formation of tau aggregates, brain tissue samples did not show any activation of the UPR. Taken together, the results from these three model systems suggest that a direct mechanistic link does not exist between tau aggregation and the UPR. (C) 2010 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available