4.4 Article

SCOPRISM: A new algorithm for automatic sleep scoring in mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 235, Issue -, Pages 277-284

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2014.07.018

Keywords

Sleep; Scoring; Validation; Mice; Rat; Narcolepsy

Funding

  1. University of Bologna [RFO 08-II, FEBO120705]
  2. Ministry of Instruction, University and Research, Italy [prot. 2008FY7K9S]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Scoring of wake-sleep states by trained investigators is a time-consuming task in many sleep experiments. We aimed to validate SCOPRISM, a new open-source algorithm for sleep scoring based on automatic graphical clustering of epoch distribution. Methods: We recorded sleep and blood pressure signals of 36 orexin-deficient, 7 leptin knock-out, and 43 wild-type control mice in the PRISM laboratory. Additional groups of mice (n =14) and rats (n = 6) recorded in independent labs were used to validate the algorithm across laboratories. Results: The overall accuracy, specificity and sensitivity values of SCOPRISM (97%, 95%, and 94%, respectively) on PRISM lab data were similar to those calculated between human scorers (98%, 98%, and 94%, respectively). Using SCOPRISM, we replicated the main sleep and sleep-dependent cardiovascular findings of our previous studies. Finally, the cross-laboratory analyses showed that the SCOPRISM algorithm performed well on mouse and rat data. Comparison with existing methods: SCOPRISM performed similarly or even better than recently reported algorithms. SCOPRISM is a very simple algorithm, extensively (cross)validated and with the possibility to evaluate its efficacy following a quick and easy visual flow chart. Conclusions: We validated SCOPRISM, a new, automated and open-source algorithm for sleep scoring on a large population of mice, including different mutant strains and on subgroups of mice and rats recorded by independent labs. This algorithm should help accelerate basic research on sleep and integrative physiology in rodents. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available