4.4 Article

Material characterization and computer model simulation of low density polyurethane foam used in a rodent traumatic brain injury model

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE METHODS
Volume 198, Issue 1, Pages 93-98

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2011.03.024

Keywords

Rodent head impact acceleration device; Traumatic brain injury; Low density polyurethane foam; Compression test; Rate dependency; Finite element modeling

Funding

  1. National Highway Transportation Safety Administration (NHTSA) through the UAB Southern Consortium of Injury Biomechanics
  2. NIH [R01 EB006508]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Computer models of the head can be used to simulate the events associated with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and quantify biomechanical response within the brain. Marmarou's impact acceleration rodent model is a widely used experimental model of TBI mirroring axonal pathology in humans. The mechanical properties of the low density polyurethane (PU) foam, an essential piece of energy management used in Marmarou's impact device, has not been fully characterized. The foam used in Marmarou's device was tested at seven strain rates ranging from quasi-static to dynamic (0.014-42.86 s(-1)) to quantify the stress-strain relationships in compression. Recovery rate of the foam after cyclic compression was also determined through the periods of recovery up to three weeks. The experimentally determined stress-strain curves were incorporated into a material model in an explicit Finite Element (FE) solver to validate the strain rate dependency of the FE foam model. Compression test results have shown that the foam used in the rodent impact acceleration model is strain rate dependent. The foam has been found to be reusable for multiple impacts. However the stress resistance of used foam is reduced to 70% of the new foam. The FU_CHANG_FOAM material model in an FE solver has been found to be adequate to simulate this rate sensitive foam. (C) 2011 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available