4.7 Article

A Cation-π Interaction in the Binding Site of the Glycine Receptor Is Mediated by a Phenylalanine Residue

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 28, Issue 43, Pages 10937-10942

Publisher

SOC NEUROSCIENCE
DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2540-08.2008

Keywords

ligand-gated ion channel; Cys-loop receptor; cation-pi interaction; unnatural amino acids; nonsense suppression; neurotransmitter

Categories

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust
  2. Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council
  3. National Institutes of Health [NS11756, NS34407]
  4. Australian Research Council
  5. National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia
  6. University of Queensland
  7. Medical Research Council [MC_U105184294] Funding Source: researchfish
  8. MRC [MC_U105184294] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cys-loop receptor binding sites characteristically contain many aromatic amino acids. In nicotinic ACh and 5-HT3 receptors, a Trp residue forms a cation-pi interaction with the agonist, whereas in GABA(A) receptors, a Tyr performs this role. The glycine receptor binding site, however, contains predominantly Phe residues. Homology models suggest that two of these Phe side chains, Phe159 and Phe207, and possibly a third, Phe63, are positioned such that they could contribute to a cation-pi interaction with the primary amine of glycine. Here, we test this hypothesis by incorporation of a series of fluorinated Phe derivatives using unnatural amino acid mutagenesis. The data reveal a clear correlation between the glycine EC50 value and the cation-pi binding ability of the fluorinated Phe derivatives at position 159, but not at positions 207 or 63, indicating a single cation-pi interaction between glycine and Phe159. The data thus provide an anchor point for locating glycine in its binding site, and demonstrate for the first time a cation-pi interaction between Phe and a neurotransmitter.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available