4.4 Article

Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 5, Pages 2512-2521

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00949.2010

Keywords

sensorimotor plasticity; human motor learning; arm movements; reaching

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Wong JD, Wilson ET, Gribble PL. Spatially selective enhancement of proprioceptive acuity following motor learning. J Neurophysiol 105: 2512-2521, 2011. First published March 2, 2011; doi:10.1152/jn.00949.2010.-It is well recognized that the brain uses sensory information to accurately produce motor commands. Indeed, most research into the relationship between sensory and motor systems has focused on how sensory information modulates motor function. In contrast, recent studies have begun to investigate the reverse: how sensory and perceptual systems are tuned based on motor function, and specifically motor learning. In the present study we investigated changes to human proprioceptive acuity following recent motor learning. Sensitivity to small displacements of the hand was measured before and after 10 min of motor learning, during which subjects grasped the handle of a robotic arm and guided a cursor to a series of visual targets randomly located within a small workspace region. We used a novel method of assessing proprioceptive acuity that avoids active movement, interhemispheric transfer, and intermodality coordinate transformations. We found that proprioceptive acuity improved following motor learning, but only in the region of the arm's workspace explored during learning. No proprioceptive improvement was observed when motor learning was performed in a different location or when subjects passively experienced limb trajectories matched to those of subjects who actively performed motor learning. Our findings support the idea that sensory changes occur in parallel with changes to motor commands during motor learning.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Neurosciences

A rapid visuomotor response on the human upper limb is selectively influenced by implicit motor learning

Chao Gu, J. Andrew Pruszynski, Opaul L. Gribble, Brian D. Corneil

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Neurosciences

Neural signatures of reward and sensory error feedback processing in motor learning

Dimitrios J. Palidis, Joshua G. A. Cashaback, Paul L. Gribble

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Neurosciences

Both fast and slow learning processes contribute to savings following sensorimotor adaptation

Susan K. Coltman, Joshua G. A. Cashaback, Paul L. Gribble

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Neurosciences

Spinal stretch reflexes support efficient hand control

Jeffrey Weiler, Paul L. Gribble, J. Andrew Pruszynski

NATURE NEUROSCIENCE (2019)

Article Biochemical Research Methods

The gradient of the reinforcement landscape influences sensorimotor learning

Joshua G. A. Cashaback, Christopher K. Lao, Dimitrios J. Palidis, Susan K. Coltman, Heather R. McGregor, Paul L. Gribble

PLOS COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY (2019)

Article Neurosciences

Somatosensory cortical excitability changes precede those in motor cortex during human motor learning

Hiroki Ohashi, Paul L. Gribble, David J. Ostry

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2019)

Article Neurosciences

Generalizing movement patterns following shoulder fixation

Rodrigo S. Maeda, Julia M. Zdybal, Paul L. Gribble, J. Andrew Pruszynski

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Neurosciences

EEG correlates of physical effort and reward processing during reinforcement learning

Dimitrios J. Palidis, Paul L. Gribble

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Neurosciences

The effect of instruction on motor skill learning

Nicola J. Popp, Atsushi Yokoi, Paul L. Gribble, Jorn Diedrichsen

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2020)

Article Neurosciences

Null effects of levodopa on reward- and error-based motor adaptation, saving and anterograde interference

Dimitrios J. Palidis, Heather R. McGregor, Andrew Vo, Penny A. MacDonald, Paul L. Gribble

Summary: Levodopa did not affect any component of motor adaptation, suggesting that motor adaptation may not rely on the dopaminergic mechanisms disrupted by levodopa in cognitive tasks.

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Neurosciences

Sensitivity to error during visuomotor adaptation is similarly modulated by abrupt, gradual, and random perturbation schedules

Susan K. Coltman, Robert J. van Beers, W. Pieter Medendorp, Paul L. Gribble

Summary: The study investigated how prior experience modulates error sensitivity within a two-state model of short-term sensorimotor adaptation. It found that sensitivity to adaptation error was similarly modulated by abrupt, gradual, and random perturbation schedules.

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2021)

Article Neurosciences

The role of feedback in the production of skilled finger sequences

Nicola J. Popp, Carlos R. Hernandez-Castillo, Paul L. Gribble, Jorn Diedrichsen

Summary: Sensory feedback is crucial for fine control of hand movements, but little is known about its role in movement sequences. This study investigated the use of sensory feedback during the production of finger movement sequences. The researchers observed rapid adjustments of ongoing finger presses in response to feedback perturbations, with haptic feedback playing a key role. These adjustments reduced in size with practice but were still present at the end of training. Additionally, feedback perturbations resulted in a delayed onset of subsequent presses, suggesting a hierarchical organization of skilled movement sequences.

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY (2022)

Article Biology

Sensorimotor feedback loops are selectively sensitive to reward

Olivier Codol, Mehrdad Kashefi, Christopher J. Forgaard, Joseph M. Galea, J. Andrew Pruszynski, Paul L. Gribble

Summary: Although it is known that motivation can improve motor performance, the mechanisms behind this improvement are unclear. This study systematically tested the effects of reward on different feedback loops in humans and found that only the fastest loops were insensitive to reward. The earliest reward-driven changes were an increase in feedback gains rather than a reduction in response latency. These findings have potential implications for athletic coaching, suggesting that reward-sensitive feedback responses should be specifically targeted for improvement.

ELIFE (2023)

Article Biology

How humans initiate energy optimization and converge on their optimal gaits

Jessica C. Selinger, Jeremy D. Wong, Surabhi N. Simha, J. Maxwell Donelan

JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL BIOLOGY (2019)

No Data Available