4.4 Article

The dynamics of somatic input processing in spinal motoneurons in vivo

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 105, Issue 3, Pages 1170-1178

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00592.2010

Keywords

synaptic processing

Funding

  1. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke [NS062200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mitchell CS, Lee RH. The dynamics of somatic input processing in spinal motoneurons in vivo. J Neurophysiol 105: 1170-1178, 2011. First published December 29, 2010; doi: 10.1152/jn.00592.2010.-Uncovering how motoneurons utilize their voltage-sensitive conductances to systematically respond to a variety of inputs is paramount to understanding synaptic integration. In this study, we examine the input dynamics and frequency-dependent characteristics of active conductances in motoneurons as viewed from the soma in the decerebrate cat. We evaluated the somatic response of the motoneuron by superimposing a voltage sinus sweep (a sine wave in which frequency increases with time, which is often referred to as a zap or chirp) at a subset of membrane holding potentials during discontinuous, single-electrode, somatic voltage-clamp. Results from both experimental and modeling data indicate that ionic conductances can respond to a wide variety of input dynamics. Notably, it appears that there is a divergence between low input conductance type S and high input conductance type FF motoneurons in their response to input frequency. Type S motoneurons generate a larger response to lower frequency input dynamics (compared with their response to higher frequencies), whereas type FF generate a larger response to higher input frequency dynamics. Functionally, these results may indicate that motoneurons on the lower end of the motor pool (i.e., recruited first) may favor steady inputs, whereas motoneurons at the higher end (i.e., recruited later) may favor input transients in producing action potentials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available