4.4 Article

Dendrite Elongation and Dendritic Branching Are Affected Separately by Different Forms of Intrinsic Motoneuron Excitability

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROPHYSIOLOGY
Volume 100, Issue 5, Pages 2525-2536

Publisher

AMER PHYSIOLOGICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1152/jn.90758.2008

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. German Research Foundation [Du 331/5-1]
  2. Arizona State University
  3. Interdisciplinary Neuroscience Graduate Program at Arizona State University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Duch C, Vonhoff F, Ryglewski S. Dendrite elongation and dendritic branching are affected separately by different forms of intrinsic motoneuron excitability. J Neurophysiol 100: 2525-2536, 2008. First published August 20, 2008; doi:10.1152/jn.90758.2008. Dendrites are the fundamental determinant of neuronal wiring. Consequently dendritic defects are associated with numerous neurological diseases and mental retardation. Neuronal activity can have profound effects on dendritic structure, but the mechanisms controlling distinct aspects of dendritic architecture are not fully understood. We use the Drosophila genetic model system to test the effects of altered intrinsic excitability on postembryonic dendritic architecture development. Targeted dominant negative knock-downs of potassium channel subunits allow for selectively increasing the intrinsic excitability of a selected subset of motoneurons, whereas targeted expression of a genetically modified noninactivating potassium channel decrease intrinsic excitability in vivo. Both manipulations cause significant dendritic overgrowth, but by different mechanisms. Increased excitability causes increased dendritic branch formation, whereas decreased excitability causes increased dendritic branch elongation. Therefore dendritic branching and branch elongation are controlled by separate mechanisms that can be addressed selectively in vivo by different manipulations of neuronal intrinsic excitability.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available