4.7 Article

Fingolimod versus intramuscular interferon in patient subgroups from TRANSFORMS

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROLOGY
Volume 260, Issue 8, Pages 2023-2032

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00415-013-6932-0

Keywords

Multiple sclerosis; Randomized clinical trial; Fingolimod; Interferon-beta; MRI; Subgroup analysis

Funding

  1. Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the 12-month phase 3 TRANSFORMS study, fingolimod showed greater efficacy than intramuscular interferon beta (IFN beta)-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This study analyzed fingolimod efficacy compared with IFN beta-1a in patient subgroups from TRANSFORMS. Patients were randomized to receive fingolimod or weekly IM IFN beta-1a for 12 months. Analyses of efficacy included annualized relapse rate (ARR), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures [gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions, new/newly enlarged (active) T2 lesions, brain volume change]. Subgroups were defined based on demographics, disease characteristics (baseline EDSS score, relapse rate, and MRI parameters), and response to previous therapy. Fingolimod 0.5 mg reduced ARR over 12 months by 32-59 % relative to IFN beta-1a in all subgroups defined by demographic factors or baseline disease characteristics. Fingolimod also reduced the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions, active T2 lesions, and the rate of brain volume loss, versus IFN beta-1a in most (95 %) subgroups. In patients with high disease activity despite IFN beta treatment in the year before study, fingolimod 0.5 mg reduced ARR by 61 % relative to IFN beta-1a. Reductions in lesion counts and brain volume loss also favored fingolimod in these patients. In conclusion, consistently better efficacy was observed for fingolimod compared with IFN beta-1a across different subgroups of patients with RRMS.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available