4.2 Article

Fractional carbon dioxide laser-assisted photodynamic therapy for patients with actinic keratosis

Journal

PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE
Volume 31, Issue 6, Pages 296-301

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12184

Keywords

ablative carbon dioxide fractional laser; actinic keratosis; photodynamic therapy; short incubation time

Categories

Funding

  1. Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRK) from the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology [NRF-2013R1A1A2006944]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background/purposeA relatively long incubation time is needed for photosensitizer absorption in conventional photodynamic therapy (PDT) for actinic keratosis (AK). The use of ablative CO2 fractional lasers (AFXLs) to increase drug delivery could shorten the incubation time. Here, we aimed to compare the efficacy between AFXL-assisted PDT with a short incubation time and conventional PDT for AK. MethodsPatients with histopathologically confirmed facial AK were randomly divided into two groups. The lesions were histopathologically classified into grades I-III. In the AFXL-assisted PDT group, an ablative fractional laser was used for pretreatment, prior to the application of methyl aminolevulinate, with an incubation time of 90min. Irradiation was performed with a 630-nm light-emitting diode. In the conventional PDT group, the incubation time was 180min. All the patients received two rounds of PDT at 2-week intervals and underwent clinical or histological evaluation at 10weeks after the first PDT course. ResultsTwenty-two patients underwent conventional PDT and 24 patients underwent AFXL-assisted PDT. Thirty-four AKs were included in the conventional PDT group, and 35 AKs were included in the AFXL-assisted PDT group. The clearance rate was 64.7% in the conventional PDT and 71.4% in the AFXL-assisted PDT group; no significant differences in the clearance rate were noted between the groups (P=0.55). The clearance rates for each grade also did not significantly differ between the two groups. ConclusionsThe use of AFXL before PDT reduced the incubation time, but yielded similar treatment efficacy as compared to conventional PDT.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available