4.5 Article

Opposite effects of anandamide and n-arachidonoyl dopamine in the regulation of prostaglandin E2 and 8-iso-PGF2α formation in primary glial cells

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 109, Issue 2, Pages 452-464

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.05966.x

Keywords

8-iso-PGF(2 alpha); glial cells; microsomal prostaglandin E synthase 1; n-arachidonoyl dopamine; neuroinflammation; prostaglandin E-2

Funding

  1. MEC [SAF-2004-00926, SAF2007-60305]
  2. Spanish RIS Network [RD06-0006]
  3. CAPES Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It is widely accepted that neuroinflammation is a key player in various pathological events associated with brain injury. More specifically, glial activation and the subsequent release of pro-inflammatory cytokines, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and prostaglandins play a role of paramount importance in cerebral damage. In this study, we examined the role of two endocannabinoids, anandamide (AEA) and N-arachidonoyldopamine (NADA) in the regulation of prostaglandin E-2 (PGE(2)) synthesis in primary glial cells. We show that NADA is a potent inhibitor of PGE(2) synthesis in lipopolysaccharide (LPS) stimulated cells, without modifying the expression or enzymatic activity of COX-2 and the production of prostaglandin D-2. We also show that NADA has the ability to prevent the free radical formation in primary microglial cells. The key findings of this investigation are our observation that AEA and NADA have opposite effects on glial cells and, most importantly, the first description of NADA as a potential antioxidative and anti-inflammatory agent acting through a mechanism that involves reduction in the synthesis of microsomal prostaglandin E synthase in LPS-activated microglia. These findings provide new mechanistic insights into the anti-inflammatory activities of NADA in the CNS and its potential to design novel therapeutic strategies to manage neuroinflammatory diseases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available