4.5 Article

Adult neural stem/progenitor cells reduce NMDA-induced excitotoxicity via the novel neuroprotective peptide pentinin

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEUROCHEMISTRY
Volume 109, Issue 3, Pages 858-866

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-4159.2009.06016.x

Keywords

excitotoxicity; hippocampus; insulin; neuroprotection; NMDA; stem cells

Funding

  1. Swedish Medical Research Council, Swedish Stroke Society
  2. Edit Jacobson Foundation
  3. Royal Society of Arts and Sciences in Goteborg
  4. Swedish Society of Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the potential of adult neural stem cells to repair damage via cell replacement has been widely reported, the ability of endogenous stem cells to positively modulate damage is less well studied. We investigated whether medium conditioned by adult hippocampal stem/progenitor cells altered the extent of excitotoxic cell death in hippocampal slice cultures. Conditioned medium significantly reduced cell death following 24 h of exposure to 10 mu M NMDA. Neuroprotection was greater in the dentate gyrus, a region neighboring the subgranular zone where stem/progenitor cells reside compared with pyramidal cells of the cornis ammonis. Using mass spectrometric analysis of the conditioned medium, we identified a pentameric peptide fragment that corresponded to residues 26-30 of the insulin B chain which we termed 'pentinin'. The peptide is a putative breakdown product of insulin, a constituent of the culture medium, and may be produced by insulin-degrading enzyme, an enzyme expressed by the stem/progenitor cells. In the presence of 100 pM of synthetic pentinin, the number of mature and immature neurons killed by NMDA-induced toxicity was significantly reduced in the dentate gyrus. These data suggest that progenitors in the subgranular zone may convert exogenous insulin into a peptide capable of protecting neighboring neurons from excitotoxic injury.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available