4.5 Article

Hepatocellular carcinoma specific graded prognostic assessment can predict outcomes for patients with brain metastases from hepatocellular carcinoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 120, Issue 1, Pages 199-207

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-014-1546-7

Keywords

Brain metastasis; Hepatocellular carcinoma; Prognostic factor

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stratifying patients with brain metastasis (BM) from hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) by prognostic factors can be useful when making treatment decisions. Nevertheless, a diagnosis-specific graded prognostic assessment (GPA) for HCC has not been well established. We retrospectively reviewed the data from 118 HCC patients newly diagnosed with BM at the Yonsei University Health System between 1985 and 2011. After univariate and multivariate analyses of prognostic factors, those shown to significantly affect survival were used to develop a HCC-specific GPA (HCC-GPA) index. The median overall survival after BM in all patients was 6.1 weeks (95 % confidence interval 4.8-7.4 weeks). Using the prognostic factors identified via multivariate analysis, we developed a HCC-GPA index, including number of brain metastases (single: 0.5, multiple: 0 points), alpha-feto protein (< 400 ng/mL: 0.5, a parts per thousand yen400 ng/mL: 0 points), and Child-Pugh-Score (A: 3, B: 2, C: 0 points). There were no survival differences for age, sex, performance status, and time interval from initial diagnosis to development of BM. Median survival times from BM were discriminable when applying the HCC-GPA scoring system: 1.7, 3.2, 7.9, and 27.0 weeks for HCC-GPA scores of 0-1.0 (N = 16), 1.5-2.5 (N = 32), 3.0-3.5 (N = 49), and 4.0 (N = 21), respectively (P < 0.001). Although the prognoses of patients with BM from HCC are dismal, the newly developed HCC-GPA index can be used to discriminate the expected prognoses thereof. Moreover, the index may hold value as a tool for selecting patients who may be good candidates for active local treatment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available