4.5 Article

Clinical outcomes for a novel 6 degrees of freedom image guided localization method for frameless radiosurgery for intracranial brain metastases

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 113, Issue 1, Pages 93-99

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-013-1093-7

Keywords

Radiation therapy; Radiosurgery; Frameless radiosurgery; Brain metastases

Funding

  1. Emory University Office of Technology Transfer (OTT)
  2. Velocity Medical Systems

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) is an accepted method of treatment for intracranial brain metastases with sub-millimeter accuracy. Frameless radiosurgery (FRS) is becoming an alternative to framed SRS due to its less invasive requirements. The purpose of this study is to describe the clinical outcomes and local patterns of failure for a novel 6 degrees of freedom CT guided method of localization for FRS of intracranial brain metastases. 42 patients underwent linear accelerator-based FRS to 94 intracranial brain metastases between 01/2009 and 07/2011. 78 and 22 % of treated sites were intact metastases and resection cavities, respectively. 55 % of patients had undergone prior brain radiotherapy (45 % SRS, 26 % whole brain radiation therapy). The 1 year actuarial local recurrence rate was 18 %, with a median imaging follow-up period of 13.2 months. Single fraction equivalent dose was the most important predictor of local recurrence. The 1 year actuarial first distant brain recurrence and total intracranial recurrence rate was 58 and 69 %, respectively. The crude radiographic radiation necrosis rate was 3 %. Of the 10 local recurrence events, 8 (80 %) were in-field only, 1 (10 %) was marginal only, and 1 (10 %) was both. The preponderance of in-field only patterns of failure suggests that geographic miss is not a major contributor to local recurrence using this novel localization method for FRS. The 1 year local control rate is comparable to other similar published series of framed and frameless radiosurgery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available