4.5 Article

Nuclear survivin expression predicts poorer prognosis in glioblastoma

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURO-ONCOLOGY
Volume 91, Issue 3, Pages 353-358

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11060-008-9720-4

Keywords

Survivin; Glioblastoma; Radiotherapy; Nuclear; Cytoplasm

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan for Young Scientists

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Survivin is a member of the inhibitor of apoptosis family, and is expressed in various malignant tumors. Survivin overexpression has been reported to be a poorer prognostic factor in various malignancies. However, the prognostic value of survivin expression in patients with glioblastoma is still controversial. Therefore, in this study the role of survivin as a predictor for survival was investigated in patients with glioblastoma. Tissue specimens were obtained from 66 patients with glioblastoma treated with radiotherapy. Survivin expression was detected by an immunohistochemical method. Nuclear and cytoplasm survivin scores were defined by using the cell positivity and staining intensity. The scores were defined as follows, 0 (no staining), 1 (less than 50% of cell positivity and any staining), 2 (more than 50% of cell positivity and weak to moderate intensity) and 3 (more than 50% of cell positivity and strong intensity). The correlation between survivin scores and the overall survival rate was evaluated. Nuclear and cytoplasm survivin staining were noted in 47 and 58 patients, respectively. The number of patients with nuclear survivin score of 0, 1, 2 and 3, were 19 (28.8%), 26 (39.4%), 9 (13.6%) and 12 (18.2%), respectively. The 3-year overall survival rate of the nuclear survivin score 3 was 0%, significantly lower than the 11.6% of the nuclear survivin score a parts per thousand currency sign2 (P = 0.0003). Cytoplasm survivin score did not correlate with the prognosis. Nuclear survivin expression may be a useful biomarker for predicting prognosis in patients with glioblastoma.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available