4.3 Article

A novel biomarker for retinal degeneration: vitreous body neurofilament proteins

Journal

JOURNAL OF NEURAL TRANSMISSION
Volume 116, Issue 12, Pages 1601-1606

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00702-009-0316-8

Keywords

Vitreous; The phosphorylated neurofilament heavy chain (NfH); Retinal detachment; Epiretinal gliosis; Retinal degeneration

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Retinal degeneration leads to release of cell-type specific proteins into the adjacent compartment. Here we investigated whether the neurofilament heavy chain protein (NfH) could be measured from the vitreous body and anterior chamber fluid. This prospective study included 85 patients who underwent vitrectomy (44 retinal detachment, 12 macular hole, 15 epiretinal gliosis, 8 organ donors) or trabelectomy (six glaucoma). The cut-off level was calculated from the organ donors. An established enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA, SMI35) was used for quantification of NfH (190-210 kDa). Measurable levels of NfH were detected from the vitreous body homogenate, but not from the anterior chamber fluid. The cut-off level was 0.29 ng/mL. A significant proportion of patients suffering from retinal detachment (43.2%, mean 0.74 ng/mL) had vitreous body NfH levels above cut-off when compared to organ donors (0%, 0.12 ng/mL, p = 0.02), epiretinal sclerosis (1.6%, 0.05 ng/mL, p = 0.01), macular hole (0%, 0.04 ng/mL, p = 0.004). Following retinal detachment, vitreous NfH-SMI35 levels correlated with time from onset (R = -0.3, p < 0.05), persisting for up to 2 years. This study shows that NfH can be quantified from the human vitreous body and may be a useful novel biomarker for retinal degeneration. The method can be applied for investigating the dynamics of retinal degeneration and the response to neuroprotective strategies in a broad range of retinal diseases in either clinical or experimental research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available