4.2 Article

Does the Cognitive Dispute of Psychotic Symptoms do Harm to the Therapeutic Alliance?

Journal

JOURNAL OF NERVOUS AND MENTAL DISEASE
Volume 198, Issue 7, Pages 478-485

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e3181e4f526

Keywords

Schizophrenia; cognitive behavioral therapy; course of therapeutic alliance; symptoms; insight

Funding

  1. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (Bundesministerium fur Bildung und Forschung, BMBF) [01GV0618]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We examined whether the cognitive dispute of psychotic symptoms has a negative impact on the course of the therapeutic alliance. Sixty-seven patients with persistent psychotic symptoms received either cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) or supportive therapy. Questionnaire-based alliance ratings were repeatedly obtained throughout the course of therapy. Patient and therapist alliance ratings were examined separately. Data analyses comprised repeated measurement analyses of variance and cluster analytic procedures. Neither patient nor therapist alliance ratings showed a differential course throughout the treatments. This was despite the implementation of disputing strategies in later stages of CBT. Irrespective of the treatment condition a cluster with a positive alliance rating and a cluster with a poorer rating were found for therapist and patient ratings, respectively. Baseline symptoms and insight differentiated between the types of clusters. In conclusion, CBT-specific interventions that challenge psychotic symptoms do not necessarily negatively influence the course of the alliance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available