4.4 Article

Examination of the distribution of the tensile deformation systems in tension and tension-creep of Ti-6Al-4V (wt.%) at 296K and 728K

Journal

PHILOSOPHICAL MAGAZINE
Volume 95, Issue 7, Pages 691-729

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/14786435.2014.1001459

Keywords

tensile; titanium alloys; metallurgy; microstructural characterization; creep

Funding

  1. US Department of Energy, Office of Basic Energy Science [DE-FG02-09ER46637]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The deformation behaviour of an alpha+beta Ti-6Al-4V (wt.%) alloy was investigated during in situ deformation inside a scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Tensile experiments were performed at 296 and 728K (~0.4Tm), while a tensile-creep experiment was performed at 728K and 310MPa (sigma/sigma(ys)=0.74). The active deformation systems were identified using electron backscattered diffraction-based slip-trace analysis and SEM images of the specimen surface. The distribution of the active deformation systems varied as a function of temperature. Basal slip deformation played a major role in the tensile deformation behaviour, and the relative activity of basal slip increased with increasing temperature. For the 296K tension deformation, basal slip was less active than prismatic slip, whereas this was reversed at 728K. Twinning was observed in both the 296 and 728K tension experiments; however, no more than 4% of the total deformation systems observed was twins. The tension-creep experiment revealed no slip traces, however grain boundary ledge formation was observed, suggesting that grain boundary sliding was an active deformation mechanism. The results of this work were compared with those from previous studies on commercially pure Ti, Ti-5Al-2.5Sn (wt.%) and Ti-8Al-1Mo-1V (wt.%), and the effects of alloying on the deformation behaviour are discussed. The relative amount of basal slip activity increased with increasing Al content.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available