4.2 Article Proceedings Paper

Germanium Nanowires with 3-nm-Diameter Prepared by Low Temperature Vapour-Liquid-Solid Chemical Vapour Deposition

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOSCIENCE AND NANOTECHNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages 8163-8168

Publisher

AMER SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.1166/jnn.2011.5049

Keywords

Vapour-Liquid-Solid; Chemical Vapour Deposition; Nanowire; Germanium; Au Nanoparticles; Gibbs-Thomson Effect

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report the growth of germanium nanowires (Ge NWs) with single-step temperature method via vapour-liquid-solid (VLS) mechanism in the low pressure chemical vapour deposition (CVD) reactor at 300 degrees C, 280 degrees C, and 260 degrees C. The catalyst used in our experiment was Au nanoparticles with equivalent thicknesses of 0.1 nm (average diameter similar to 3 nm), 0.3 nm (average diameter similar to 4 nm), 1 nm (average diameter similar to 6 nm), and 3 nm (average diameter similar to 14 nm). The Gibbs-Thomson effect was used to explain our experimental results. The Ge NWs grown at 300 degrees C tend to have tapered structure while the Ge NWs grown at 280 degrees C and 260 degrees C tend to have straight structure. Tapering was caused by the uncatalysed deposition of Ge atoms via CVD mechanism on the sidewalls of nanowire and significantly minimised at lower temperature. We observed that the growth at lower temperature yielded Ge NWs with smaller diameter and also observed that the diameter and length of Ge NWs increases with the size of Au nanoparticles for all growth temperatures. For the same size of Au nanoparticles, Ge NWs tend to be longer with a decrease in temperature. The Ge NWs grown at 260 degrees C from 0.1-nm-thick Au had diameter as small as similar to 3 nm, offering an opportunity to fabricate high-performance p-type ballistic Ge NW transistor, to realise nanowire solar cell with higher efficiency, and also to observe the quantum confinement effect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available