4.4 Review

Potential inhalation exposure and containment efficiency when using hoods for handling nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 15, Issue 9, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-013-1880-2

Keywords

Airborne nanoparticle; Inhalation exposure; Local exhaust ventilation; Nanoparticle handling; Dose metric

Funding

  1. Nanoscale Science and Engineering Centers for High-rate Nanomanufacturing (CHN)
  2. National Science Foundation [NSF-0425826]
  3. Pharmaceutical Containment Technology and Labconco Corporation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Inhalation exposure to airborne nanoparticles (NPs) has been reported during manual activities using typical fume hoods. This research studied potential inhalation exposure associated with the manual handling of NPs using two new nanoparticle-handling enclosures and two biological safety cabinets, and discussed the ability to contain NPs in the hoods to reduce environmental release and exposure. Airborne concentrations of 5 nm to 20 mu m diameter particles were measured while handling nanoalumina particles in various ventilated enclosures. Tests were conducted using two handling conditions and concentrations were measured using real-time particle counters, and particles were collected on transmission electron microscope grids to determine particle morphology and elemental composition. Airflow patterns were characterized visually using a laser-light sheet and fog. The average number concentration increase at breathing zone outside the enclosure was less than 1,400 particle/cm(3) for each particle size at all tested conditions and the estimated overall mass concentration was about 83 mu g/m(3) which was less than the dosage of typical nanoparticle inhalation exposure studies. The typical front-to-back airflow was used in the studied hoods, which could potentially induce reverse turbulence in the wake region. However, containment of NPs using studied hoods was demonstrated with excellent performance. Smoke tests showed that worker's hand motion could potentially cause nanoparticle escape. The challenge of front-to-back airflow can be partially overcome by gentle motion, low face velocity, and front exhaust to reduce nanoparticle escape.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available