4.4 Article

Raman study of cations' distribution in ZnxMg1-xFe2O4 nanoparticles

Journal

JOURNAL OF NANOPARTICLE RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11051-012-0798-4

Keywords

Raman spectroscopy; Cubic ferrite; Magnetic nanoparticles; Cation' distribution; Mossbauer spectroscopy

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. CAPES
  3. FINEP

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In a complementary way, Raman and Mossbauer spectroscopy were successfully employed to assess the cations' distribution among the tetrahedral (A-site) and octahedral (B-site) sites of nonosized ZnxMg1-xFe2O4 (0 <= x <= 1) cubic ferrite structure, synthesized by combustion reaction method. Nanoparticles with little change in size distributions, in the 40 nm (x = 0.0) up to 42 nm (x = 1.0) were obtained. Mossbauer data indicated that as the Zn-content (x) increases in the range 0 <= x <= 1, the Fe3+ ion monotonically increases (decreases) the A-site (B-site) occupancy up to nearly equal values at the highest end x value. Analysis of the Raman data, however, confirms that the three highest energy modes around 650, 668 and 710 cm(-1) are assigned to Zn-O (B-site), Fe-O (A-site) and Mg-O (A-site) vibrations, respectively. Additionally, in agreement with the Mossbauer data, the Raman data show that as the Zn-content (x) increases in the range 0 <= x <= 1, the occupancy of A-sites by Mg2+ ions monotonically reduces with concomitant increase of A- and B-sites occupancy by Fe3+ and Zn2+ ions, respectively. Indeed, combination of the two sets of spectroscopic data (Raman and Mossbauer) provides an effective protocol for assessing the cations' distribution within the crystal structure of nanosized quaternary cubic ferrite samples running for instance from [Fe-0.42(3+) Mg-0.58(2+)](A) [Zn0.202+Mg0.222+Fe1.583+](B) O-4(2-) at x = 0.2 up to [Fe-1.0(3+)](A) [Zn0.602+Mg0.402+Fe1.03+](B) O-4(2-) at x = 0.6.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available