4.0 Article

Effect of electron-withdrawing group on the [3,3]-sigmatropic rearrangements of 1,5-enynes, 1,5-diynes and 1,2-diene-5-ynes: A theoretical study

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR STRUCTURE-THEOCHEM
Volume 904, Issue 1-3, Pages 69-73

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.theochem.2009.02.033

Keywords

Cope rearrangement; Electronic effect; Theoretical calculation; Activation barrier; Reaction energy

Funding

  1. Chinese Academy of Sciences [2005012]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [20872105, 40673022]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Qinghai Province [2006-G-105]
  4. Qinglan Project ofjiangsu Province [Bu 109805]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The electronic effects of an electron-withdrawing group (exemplified by formyl group) on the kinetic and thermodynamic aspects of substituted 1,5-enyne. 1,5-diyne, and 1,2-diene-5-yne Cope rearrangements were investigated by means of DFT and CBS-QB3 calculations. The energy barriers of the formyl substituted reactions are lower than those of the unsubstituted ones almost in all cases, and the barriers will be further lowered when catalyzed by ACl(3), The most obvious electronic effect was calculated for the C-2 formyl substituted 1,5-enyne rearrangements, which have activation barriers of 27.1 and 18.1 kcal/mol, respectively, for the uncatalyzed and catalyzed reactions. The charge transfer induced by the electron-withdrawing group and stabilization of the charge by Lewis acid are responsible for the different energetic profiles. The formyl substitution will change the thermodynamic profiles of the transformations, notablely, increase the reaction enthalpies of the 1,5-diyne and 1,2-diene-5-yne rearrangements by over 5.0 kcal/mol, as result of the stabilization effect of a formyl substitution attached directly to the unsaturated moieties of the products. (c) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available