4.4 Article

Nato3 Integrates with the Shh-Foxa2 Transcriptional Network Regulating the Differentiation of Midbrain Dopaminergic Neurons

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 51, Issue 1, Pages 13-27

Publisher

HUMANA PRESS INC
DOI: 10.1007/s12031-012-9939-6

Keywords

Nato3; Midbrain dopaminergic neuron; Differentiation; Transcriptional regulation; SN4741 cell line

Funding

  1. Israel Science Foundation [431/07]
  2. Legacy-Heritage Biomedical Program of the Israel Science Foundation [1914/08]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mesencephalic dopaminergic (mesDA) neurons originate from the floor plate of the midbrain, a transient embryonic organizing center located at the ventral-most midline. Since the loss of mesDA leads to Parkinson's disease, the molecular mechanisms controlling the genesis and differentiation of dopaminergic progenitors are extensively studied and the identification and characterization of new genes is of interest. Here, we show that the expression of the basic helix-loop-helix transcription factor Nato3 (Ferd3l) increases in parallel to the differentiation of SN4741 dopaminergic cells in vitro. Nato3 transcription is directly regulated by the transcription factor Foxa2, a target and effector of the Sonic hedgehog (Shh) signaling cascade. Moreover, pharmacological inhibition of Shh signaling down-regulated the expression of Nato3, thus defining Nato3 as a novel component of one of the major pathways controlling cell patterning and generation of mesDA. Furthermore, we show that Nato3 regulated Shh and Foxa2 through a novel feed-backward loop. Up- and downregulation of Nato3 further affected the transcription of Nurr1, implicated in the genesis of mesDA, but not of TH. Taken together, these data shed new light on the transcriptional networks controlling the generation of mesDA and may be utilized in the efforts to direct stem cells towards a dopaminergic fate.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available