4.3 Article

Upregulation of Gem relates to retinal ganglion cells apoptosis after optic nerve crush in adult rats

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR HISTOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 5, Pages 565-571

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10735-014-9579-y

Keywords

Gem; Optic nerve crush; Retinal ganglion cells; Apoptosis; Rat

Categories

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [2012GXNSFAA276039]
  2. Science Fund Project of People's Hospital of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region [qn2014-1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

GTP-binding protein Gem, a member protein of the Ras superfamily, can regulate actin cytoskeleton reorganization mediated by Rho-associated coiled-coil-containing protein kinase (ROCK). One attractive activity of the ROCK is playing a potential role in physiological and pathological process in retinal ganglion cells (RGCs) apoptosis. However, the function of Gem in retina is still with limited understanding. To investigate whether Gem is involved in optic nerve injury, we performed an optic nerve crush (ONC) model in adult rats. Western blot analysis indicated that Gem was significantly increased in the retina at the 3rd day after ONC. Meanwhile, double-immunofluorescent staining showed that Gem expression was mainly up-regulated in ganglion cell layer and co-localized with NeuN (a marker of RGCs). Additionally, the co-localizations of Gem/active-caspase-3 and Gem/TUNEL-positive cells were detected in RGCs. Furthermore, the expression of active-caspase-3 and TUNEL-positive cells was parallel with that of Gem. Finally, expression pattern of ROCK family (only ROCK2 but not ROCK1) was increased in the differentiated process, which was collected with the expression of GEM and active-caspase-3. Based on the present results, it is suggested that Gem might play a crucial role in RGCs apoptosis after ONC, which might be involved in ROCK pathway.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available