4.0 Article

Inhibition of human glutathione transferases by pesticides: Development of a simple analytical assay for the quantification of pesticides in water

Journal

JOURNAL OF MOLECULAR CATALYSIS B-ENZYMATIC
Volume 81, Issue -, Pages 43-51

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcatb.2012.04.022

Keywords

Glutathione transferase; In silico molecular docking; Pesticide determination; Xenobiotics

Funding

  1. Ministry of Education, Lifelong Learning, and Religious Affairs
  2. European Union - European Social Fund & National Resources

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Glutathione transferases (GSTs; EC 2.5.1.18) form a group of multifunctional enzymes that are involved in phase II cellular detoxification mechanism. Here, screening of the inhibition potency of a wide range of pesticides toward selected human GST isoenzymes (hGSTA1-1, hGSTP1-1, hGSTT2-2 and hGSTO1-1) was carried out. hGSTA1-1 was found more susceptible to inhibition by pesticides than other isoenzymes. The insecticides dieldrin and spiromesifen were identified as potent reversible inhibitors toward hGSTA1-1 with IC50 values equal to 17.9 +/- 1.7 mu M and 12.1 +/- 3.4 mu M, respectively. Based on in silico docking analysis and kinetic inhibition studies it was concluded that dieldrin and spiromesifen bind specifically to the enzyme presumably at a distinct position that partially overlaps with both the G- and H-site. The ability of dieldrin and spiromesifen to inhibit hGSTA1-1 activity was exploited for the development of analytical quantification assays for these two pesticides. Linear calibration curves were obtained for dieldrin and spiromesifen, with useful concentration in the range of 0-10 mu M. The reproducibility of the assay response, expressed by relative standard deviation, was in the order of 4.1% (N = 28). The method was successfully applied to the determination of these pesticides in real water samples without sample preparation steps. (c) 2012 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available