4.5 Article

Diagnosis and Laparoscopic Management of 12 Consecutive Cases of Ovarian Pregnancy and Review of Literature

Journal

JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY
Volume 16, Issue 3, Pages 354-359

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2009.01.002

Keywords

Ovarian ectopic; Laparoscopy; Wedge resection

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We sought to determine the outcome of the laparoscopic management of Ovarian ectopic pregnancy (OEP) in a United Kingdom district general hospital and reviewed the literature. We conducted a 5-year prospective cohort study of the management of OEP cases between January 2003 and January 2008. Twelve patients had OEP confirmed with histology among a cohort of 421 ectopic pregnancies. The mean gestational age was 45 days. All 12 patients had abdominal pain and 4 (33%) had vaginal bleeding, One (8%) patient became hypovolemic before laparoscopy. Four (33%) women had risk factors for ectopic pregnancy, 2 of whom were current intra-uterine contraceptive users. Preoperative diagnosis of ectopic pregnancy was made in 11 (92%) of 12 patients by transvaginal ultrasonography and OEP in 9 (75%) patients. All cases were managed by laparoscopic surgery with no conversion to laparotomy. The ovarian pregnancy was resected and the ovary conserved in 11 (92%) patients with only 1 requiring ail oophorectomy. The mean operating time was 49 Minutes. None of the patients needed further treatment. No complications Occurred after laparoscopic surgery and the mean hospital stay was 2 days. Considering the rarity of ovarian pregnancy, this is one of the lamest series of patients with OEP treated exclusively by laparoscopic surgery and highlights our recent experience of performing conservative laparoscopic surgery for most of our patients. Journal of Minimally Invasive Gynecology (2009) 16, 354-9 (c) 2009 AAGL. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available