4.3 Article

A confident scale-space shape representation framework for cell migration detection

Journal

JOURNAL OF MICROSCOPY
Volume 231, Issue 3, Pages 395-407

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2818.2008.02050.x

Keywords

cellular image segmentation; mean shift filtering; multiscale detail detection; snake model; time-lapse microscopy; 3T3 cell

Categories

Funding

  1. NSFC (National Science Foundation of China) [60502033, 60632040]
  2. NIH [R01 LM008696]
  3. HCNR
  4. NATIONAL LIBRARY OF MEDICINE [R01LM008696] Funding Source: NIH RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Automated segmentation of time-lapse images is a method to facilitate the understanding of the intricate biological progression, e.g. cancer cell migration. To address this problem, we introduce a shape representation enhancement over popular snake models in the context of confident scale-space such that a higher level of interpretation can hopefully be achieved. Our proposed system consists of a hierarchical analytic framework including feedback loops, self-adaptive and demand-adaptive adjustment. incorporating a steerable boundary detail term constraint based on multiscale B-spline interpolation. To minimize the noise interference inherited from, microscopy acquisition. the coarse boundary derived from the initial segmentation with refined watershed line is coupled with microscopy compensation using the mean shift filtering. A progressive approximation is applied to achieve represented as a balance between a relief function of watershed algorithm and local minima concerning multiscale optimatity. convergence and robust constraints. Experimental results show that the proposed method overcomes problems with spurious branches, arbitrary gaps, low contrast boundaries and low signal-to-noise ratio. The proposed system has the potential to serve as an automated data processing tool for cell migration applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available