4.7 Article

Study on a novel antifouling polyamide-urea reverse osmosis composite membrane (ICIC-MPD) - III. Analysis of membrane electrical properties

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE SCIENCE
Volume 310, Issue 1-2, Pages 119-128

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2007.10.041

Keywords

ICIC-MPD membrane; electrical potential difference; electrical conductivity; gap between curves; salt rejection rate

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this study, the electrical properties of the new polyamide-urea (ICIC-MPD) reverse osmosis composite membrane were analyzed via two self-made test cells. The electrical potential difference across membrane was measured via a perpendicular flow through mode potential difference measurement cell, and the electrical conductivity of membrane was tested by a tangential flow across mode conductivity measurement cell. Both streaming potential coefficient and gap between the upward and downward curves were determined by the plot of electrical potential difference versus Lip-loading and down-loading external pressure difference at both sides of membrane. It was found that pH of electrolyte solution has strong impact on streaming potential coefficient and electrical conductivity due to the dissociation of -COOH group and protonation of -NH2 group of the active layer of ICIC-MPD membrane. It was also observed that both concentration of monomer 5-isocyanato-isophthaloyl chloride (ICIC) in the organic phase and contact time of organic phase with aqueous phase play an important role in salt rejection rate, gap between curves and electrical conductivity of the prepared ICIC-MPD membrane, and experimental results indicate that salt rejection rate of ICIC-MPD membrane is closely correlated to gap between curves at either polymerization condition. In addition, the effects of fouling behaviors on electrical potential difference and electrical conductivity of membrane were also discussed. (C) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available