4.1 Article

CD Spectroscopy of Peptides and Proteins Bound to Large Unilamellar Vesicles

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEMBRANE BIOLOGY
Volume 236, Issue 3, Pages 247-253

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00232-010-9291-0

Keywords

Large unilamellar vesicle; Small unilamellar vesicle; Peptide conformation; Secondary structure; Membrane binding

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [GM46823, GM74637, GM69783, GM86685]
  2. National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Circular dichroism (CD) spectroscopy is an essential tool for determining the conformation of proteins and peptides in membranes. It can be particularly useful for measuring the free energy of partitioning of peptides into lipid vesicles. The belief is broadly held that such CD measurements can only be made using sonicated small unilamellar vesicles (SUVs) because light scattering associated with extruded large unilamellar vesicles (LUVs) is unacceptably high. We have examined this issue using several experimental approaches in which a chiral object (i.e., peptide or protein) is placed both on the membrane and outside the membrane. We show that accurate CD spectra can be collected in the presence of LUVs. This is important because SUVs, unlike LUVs, are metastable and consequently unsuitable for equilibrium thermodynamic measurements. Our data reveal that undistorted CD spectra of peptides can be measured at wavelengths above 200 nm in the presence of up to 3 mM LUVs and above 215 nm in the presence of up to 7 mM LUVs. We introduce a simple way of characterizing the effect on CD spectra of light scattering and absorption arising from suspensions of vesicles of any diameter. Using melittin as an example, we show that CD spectroscopy can be used to determine the fractional helical content of peptides in LUVs and to measure their free energy of partitioning of into LUVs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available