4.4 Article

A Diagnostic Dilemma in a Family With Cystinuria Type B Resolved by Muscle Magnetic Resonance

Journal

PEDIATRIC NEUROLOGY
Volume 52, Issue 5, Pages 548-551

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.pediatrneurol.2015.01.018

Keywords

cystinuria type B; congenital myopathy; muscle magnetic resonance; RYR1

Funding

  1. Muscular Dystrophy Association grant
  2. Great Ormond Street Hospital Children's Charity
  3. GOSH Biomedical Research centre
  4. Italian Ministry of Health [GR UO2-2010-2310981]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BACKGROUND: Congenital myopathies are inherited primary disorders of the muscle caused by mutations affecting structural, contractile, or regulatory proteins. In the more than 20 genes associated to these conditions, ryanodine receptor type 1 gene (RYR1) is responsible for the most common forms and is associated with a wide range of clinical phenotypes and pathological findings. Magnetic resonance imaging of muscle has been used increasingly to direct genetic testing in myopathies. PATIENT DESCRIPTION: We describe a consanguineous family affected by cystinuria type B, a metabolic condition linked to chromosome 19q13.2, and a different muscle phenotype that, although related to a congenital myopathy, does not have the striking histological features helping in direct genetic tests. RESULTS: The assessment of the selective involvement on muscle magnetic resonance imaging allowed the suspicion of RYR1 as the most likely gene responsible for this myopathy. The diagnosis was subsequently confirmed by the finding of a recessive RYRI mutation. CONCLUSIONS: The occurrence of congenital myopathy together with cystinuria type B is reported for the first time. The use of muscle magnetic resonance imaging and the homozygosity by descent in SLC7A9, a gene flanking RYR1, allowed us to discover a new mutation in the RYR1 gene.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available