Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
Published 2014 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Social Media and Rating Sites as Tools to Understanding Quality of Care: A Scoping Review
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
Volume 16, Issue 2, Pages e56
Publisher
JMIR Publications Inc.
Online
2014-02-21
DOI
10.2196/jmir.3024
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Letter to the Editor: Application of Facebook “Likes” as an Indicator of Quality in Health Care in Public Hospitals
- (2013) Solania Tello et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
- Do Patients “Like” Good Care? Measuring Hospital Quality via Facebook
- (2013) Alex Timian et al. AMERICAN JOURNAL OF MEDICAL QUALITY
- Enhancing the scoping study methodology: a large, inter-professional team’s experience with Arksey and O’Malley’s framework
- (2013) Helena ML Daudt et al. BMC Medical Research Methodology
- Use of Sentiment Analysis for Capturing Patient Experience From Free-Text Comments Posted Online
- (2013) Felix Greaves et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- An Analysis of Online Evaluations on a Physician Rating Website: Evidence From a German Public Reporting Instrument
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A New Dimension of Health Care: Systematic Review of the Uses, Benefits, and Limitations of Social Media for Health Communication
- (2013) S Anne Moorhead et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Physician Choice Making and Characteristics Associated With Using Physician-Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study
- (2013) Martin Emmert et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Harnessing the cloud of patient experience: using social media to detect poor quality healthcare: Table 1
- (2013) Felix Greaves et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Patient-centred healthcare, social media and the internet: the perfect storm?
- (2013) Ronen Rozenblum et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Doctor-rating websites base their reports on only a few patient reviews
- (2013) J. H. Tanne BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Associations Between Web-Based Patient Ratings and Objective Measures of Hospital Quality
- (2012) Felix Greaves ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- What Patients Say About Their Doctors Online: A Qualitative Content Analysis
- (2012) Andrea López et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Consistently Increasing Numbers of Online Ratings of Healthcare in England
- (2012) Felix Greaves et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Patients’ Ratings of Family Physician Practices on the Internet: Usage and Associations With Conventional Measures of Quality in the English National Health Service
- (2012) Felix Greaves et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Online Doctor Reviews: Do They Track Surgeon Volume, a Proxy for Quality of Care?
- (2012) Jeffrey Segal et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- A Changing Landscape of Physician Quality Reporting: Analysis of Patients’ Online Ratings of Their Physicians Over a 5-Year Period
- (2012) Guodong Gordon Gao et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Benchmarking Strategies for Measuring the Quality of Healthcare: Problems and Prospects
- (2012) Pietro Giorgio Lovaglio TheScientificWorldJOURNAL
- Associations between internet-based patient ratings and conventional surveys of patient experience in the English NHS: an observational study
- (2012) Felix Greaves et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- The relationship between commercial website ratings and traditional hospital performance measures in the USA
- (2012) Naomi S Bardach et al. BMJ Quality & Safety
- Who is more likely to use doctor-rating websites, and why? A cross-sectional study in London
- (2012) Matteo Maria Galizzi et al. BMJ Open
- Ethical Principles for Physician Rating Sites
- (2011) Daniel Strech JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Analysis of 4999 Online Physician Ratings Indicates That Most Patients Give Physicians a Favorable Rating
- (2011) Bassam Kadry et al. JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INTERNET RESEARCH
- Facebook use leads to health-care reform in Taiwan
- (2011) Shabbir Syed-Abdul et al. LANCET
- Public Reporting in Germany: the Content of Physician Rating Websites*
- (2011) M. Emmert et al. METHODS OF INFORMATION IN MEDICINE
- Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: The reflexive patient and “share-your-experience” websites
- (2011) Samantha A. Adams SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- The representation of patient experience and satisfaction in physician rating sites. A criteria-based analysis of English- and German-language sites
- (2010) Swantje Reimann et al. BMC HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Scoping studies: advancing the methodology
- (2010) Danielle Levac et al. Implementation Science
- Revisiting the online health information reliability debate in the wake of “web 2.0”: An inter-disciplinary literature and website review
- (2010) Samantha A. Adams INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS
- Putting the Public Back in Public Reporting of Health Care Quality
- (2010) Tara Lagu et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- Patients’ Evaluations of Health Care Providers in the Era of Social Networking: An Analysis of Physician-Rating Websites
- (2010) Tara Lagu et al. JOURNAL OF GENERAL INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Google Trends: A Web‐Based Tool for Real‐Time Surveillance of Disease Outbreaks
- (2009) Herman Anthony Carneiro et al. CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES
- Patient satisfaction revisited: A multilevel approach
- (2009) Karin Dorieke Hekkert et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Social desirability in the measuring of patient satisfaction after treatment of coloproctologic disorders
- (2008) Gerald D. Giebel et al. LANGENBECKS ARCHIVES OF SURGERY
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationAsk a Question. Answer a Question.
Quickly pose questions to the entire community. Debate answers and get clarity on the most important issues facing researchers.
Get Started