4.5 Article

Common variants at 5q33.1 predispose to migraine in African-American children

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL GENETICS
Volume 55, Issue 12, Pages 831-836

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jmedgenet-2018-105359

Keywords

genetics; genome-wide; neurology

Funding

  1. Institutional Development Funds from the Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
  2. Children's Hospital of Philadelphia Endowed Chair in Genomic Research
  3. NHGRI (eMERGE) [U01HG006830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Genome-wide association studies (GWASs) have identified multiple susceptibility loci for migraine in European adults. However, no large-scale genetic studies have been performed in children or African Americans with migraine. Methods We conducted a GWAS of 380 African-American children and 2129 ancestry-matched controls to identify variants associated with migraine. We then attempted to replicate our primary analysis in an independent cohort of 233 African-American patients and 4038 non-migraine control subjects. Results The results of this study indicate that common variants at 5q33.1 associated with migraine risk in African-American children (rs72793414, p=1.94x10(-9)). The association was validated in an independent study (p=3.87x10(-3)) for an overall meta-analysis p value of 3.81x10(-10). eQTL (Expression quantitative trait loci) analysis of the Genotype-Tissue Expression data also shows the genotypes of rs72793414 were strongly correlated with the mRNA expression levels of NMUR2 at 5q33.1. NMUR2 encodes a G protein-coupled receptor of neuromedin-U (NMU). NMU, a highly conserved neuropeptide, participates in diverse physiological processes of the central nervous system. Conclusions This study provides new insights into the genetic basis of childhood migraine and allow for precision therapeutic development strategies targeting migraine patients of African-American ancestry.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available