4.3 Article

Towards a practical definition of professional behaviour

Journal

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS
Volume 36, Issue 4, Pages 250-254

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2009.035121

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context Professionalism remains a challenging part of the medical curriculum to define, teach and evaluate. We suggest that one way to meet these challenges is to clarify the definition of professionalism and distinguish this from medical ethics. Methods Our analysis is two staged. First, we reviewed influential definitions of professionalism and separated elements relating to (a) ethico-legal competencies, (b) clinical competence and (c) professionalism. In reference to professionalism, we then distinguished between aspirational virtues/values and specific behaviours. From these, we develop a working definition of medical professional behaviour consisting of six domains of behaviour: responsibility; relationships with and respect for patients; probity and honesty; self awareness and capacity for reflection; collaboration and team work; and care of colleagues. Second, we tested this working definition against empirical data concerning disciplinary action against practising doctors using (a) sources in the literature and (b) an original analysis of complaints received by the Medical Board of South Australia. Conclusion Our empirical analysis supports the relevance of four of the six potential domains: responsibility; relationships with and respect for patients; probity and honesty; self awareness and capacity for reflection. There are additional reasons for retaining 'collaboration and team work' in the medical professional behaviour curriculum but 'care of colleagues' may be better addressed in the ethico-legal curriculum. Our definition of professional behaviour is consistent with the theoretical literature, captures behaviours that predict future complaints against practitioners and is consistent with current complaints about professionalism in South Australian practitioners. This definition can further the teaching and assessing of professional behaviour in medical schools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

Article Public, Environmental & Occupational Health

Overdiagnosis: one concept, three perspectives, and a model

Bjorn Hofmann, Lynette Reid, Stacy Carter, Wendy Rogers

Summary: The complexity of overdiagnosis can be analyzed and addressed through the perspectives of the person, the professional, and the population. Individuals are informed about overdiagnosis based on population-based estimates, which are influenced by professionals' conceptions and models of disease. Reconciling these different perspectives is crucial for effectively informing individuals about overdiagnosis.

EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF EPIDEMIOLOGY (2021)

Review Surgery

Beyond the RCT: When are Randomized Trials Unnecessary for New Therapeutic Devices, and What Should We Do Instead?

Arsenio Paez, Maroeska Rovers, Katrina Hutchison, Wendy Rogers, Baptiste Vasey, Peter McCulloch

Summary: The aim of this study was to develop an evidence-based framework for evaluation of therapeutic devices, based on ethical principles and clinical evidence considerations. A sequential decision-making algorithm was developed to determine when a randomized controlled trial (RCT) should be conducted to evaluate new therapeutic devices and when alternative methods can be used.

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2022)

Article Ethics

Evaluation of artificial intelligence clinical applications: Detailed case analyses show value of healthcare ethics approach in identifying patient care issues

Wendy A. Rogers, Heather Draper, Stacy M. Carter

Summary: This study conducts an ethical evaluation of two specific healthcare AI applications and explores whether general AI-assisted healthcare ethical principles capture the most ethically relevant aspects from the perspective of healthcare ethics. The results identify ethical challenges associated with potentially deceptive promises, lack of patient and public involvement in healthcare AI development and deployment, and inadequate attention to the impact of AIs on healthcare relationships.

BIOETHICS (2021)

Review Ethics

Ethical Guidance for Hard Decisions: A Critical Review of Early International COVID-19 ICU Triage Guidelines

Yves Saint James Aquino, Wendy A. Rogers, Jackie Leach Scully, Farah Magrabi, Stacy M. Carter

Summary: This article critically compares guidelines for allocating scarce resources during the COVID-19 pandemic, finding that most guidelines primarily use consequentialist reasoning in decision-making with a pluralistic approach. While medical and social criteria are considered, challenges exist in reconciling competing criteria, internal contradictions within guidelines, and use of naive objectivism in applying medical criteria for allocation.

HEALTH CARE ANALYSIS (2022)

Letter Ethics

Reports of new healthcare AI interventions should include systematic ethical evaluations

Wendy A. Rogers, Heather Draper, Stacy M. Carter

BIOETHICS (2022)

Article Ethics

Ethical and regulatory implications of the COVID-19 pandemic for the medical devices industry and its representatives

Brette Blakely, Wendy Rogers, Jane Johnson, Quinn Grundy, Katrina Hutchison, Robyn Clay-Williams, Bernadette Richards, Guy Maddern

Summary: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a significant impact on the development and deployment of medical devices, particularly in terms of medical device regulations and the operations of device representatives in hospitals. The rapid amendments to medical device regulations have raised ethical concerns due to the lack of discussion on exiting crisis standards and the potential reduction in evidence standards. The disruption caused by the pandemic has provided an opportunity to examine and refine the practices of device representatives in hospitals.

BMC MEDICAL ETHICS (2022)

Editorial Material Engineering, Electrical & Electronic

Are the Ethics of Synthetic Biology Fit for Purpose? A Case Study of Artemisinin

J. A. C. Q. U. E. L. I. N. E. DALZIELL, W. E. N. D. Y. ROGERS

PROCEEDINGS OF THE IEEE (2022)

Correction Biochemistry & Molecular Biology

Reporting guideline for the early-stage clinical evaluation of decision support systems driven by artificial intelligence: DECIDE-AI (May, 10.1038/s41591-022-01772-9, 2022)

Baptiste Vasey, Myura Nagendran, Bruce Campbell, David A. Clifton, Gary S. Collins, Spiros Denaxas, Alastair K. Denniston, Livia Faes, Bart Geerts, Mudathir Ibrahim, Xiaoxuan Liu, Bilal A. Mateen, Piyush Mathur, Melissa D. McCradden, Lauren Morgan, Johan Ordish, Campbell Rogers, Suchi Saria, Daniel S. W. Ting, Peter Watkinson, Wim Weber, Peter Wheatstone, Peter McCulloch

NATURE MEDICINE (2022)

Article Psychology, Multidisciplinary

Medical AI and human dignity: Contrasting perceptions of human and artificially intelligent (AI) decision making in diagnostic and medical resource allocation contexts

Paul Formosa, Wendy Rogers, Yannick Griep, Sarah Bankins, Deborah Richards

Summary: This research explores the issue of dignity in healthcare decision-making when AI is used, and finds that individuals have a preference for human decision-makers and positive outcomes. The identity of the decision-maker is more important in diagnostic cases, while the outcomes are more important in resource allocation cases. Participants perceive AI as dehumanizing and view humans as more suitable decision-makers.

COMPUTERS IN HUMAN BEHAVIOR (2022)

Article Computer Science, Information Systems

Utopia versus dystopia: Professional perspectives on the impact of healthcare artificial intelligence on clinical roles and skills

Yves Saint James Aquino, Wendy A. Rogers, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Helen Frazer, Khin Than Win, Nehmat Houssami, Christopher Degeling, Christopher Semsarian, Stacy M. Carter

Summary: This study examines the issue of deskilling due to healthcare artificial intelligence (AI) from the perspective of professional stakeholders involved in the development and regulation of AI. The findings reveal diverse views on the extent of AI-enabled automation in healthcare work, the impact of AI on clinical skills, and the different models of healthcare work. The study highlights the importance of considering the perspectives of various stakeholders in decision-making regarding AI development and deployment in healthcare.

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MEDICAL INFORMATICS (2023)

Article Ethics

Practical, epistemic and normative implications of algorithmic bias in healthcare artificial intelligence: a qualitative study of multidisciplinary expert perspectives

Yves Saint James Aquino, Stacy M. Carter, Nehmat Houssami, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Khin Than Win, Chris Degeling, Lei Wang, Wendy A. Rogers

Summary: This study examines strategies to mitigate algorithmic bias in healthcare AI and investigates the question of responsibility for bias. The findings reveal divergent views on bias as a problem, strategies to mitigate bias, and whether to include sociocultural identifiers in AI development. The study suggests interdisciplinary collaboration, tailored engagement activities, empirical studies, participatory methods, and increased diversity and inclusion as potential responses.

JOURNAL OF MEDICAL ETHICS (2023)

Letter Medicine, General & Internal

Increased prescribing of psychotropic medication for children and adolescents during the COVID-19 pandemic: no cause for alarm

Alain Braillon, Wendy A. Rogers

MEDICAL JOURNAL OF AUSTRALIA (2023)

Article Health Care Sciences & Services

Australian women's judgements about using artificial intelligence to read mammograms in breast cancer screening

Stacy M. Carter, Lucy Carolan, Yves Saint James Aquino, Helen Frazer, Wendy A. Rogers, Julie Hall, Chris Degeling, Annette Braunack-Mayer, Nehmat Houssami

Summary: This article explores women's values regarding the use of AI in mammographic screening for breast cancer. Although women recognize the potential of AI, they emphasize the importance of human presence in screening systems and have high expectations for AI performance. To meet women's expectations, screening programs should delay AI implementation until there is strong evidence of its improvement, maintain the central role of human expertise and responsibility, and avoid exacerbating inequities.

DIGITAL HEALTH (2023)

Article Law

The Regulation of Medical Device Representatives: A Question of Trust?

Bernadette Richards, Susannah Sage Jacobson, Mianna Lotz, Wendy Rogers

Summary: The introduction of new medical technologies has led to the development of highly technical medical devices. Medical device representatives (MDRs) play a vital role in guiding healthcare providers, but their involvement is often unknown to the patients. This paper focuses on the knowledge gap regarding the role of MDRs and proposes regulation and policy responses to address the trust issues they may pose.

LAW TECHNOLOGY AND HUMANS (2022)

Letter Surgery

Comment on Lung Transplantation for Elderly Patients With End-stage COVID-19 Pneumonia''

Ashley Baquero, David H. Beyda, Maria Fiatarone Singh, Glynn Gilcrease, Joseph E. Gutierrez, Jacob Lavee, David Matas, Norbert Paul, Bernadette Richards, Matthew P. Robertson, Wendy Rogers, Raymond Scalettar, Michael Shapiro, Adnan Sharif, Alexander H. Toledo, Torsten Trey

ANNALS OF SURGERY (2022)

No Data Available