4.2 Article

Information-theoretical complexity for the hydrogenic identity SN2 exchange reaction

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATHEMATICAL CHEMISTRY
Volume 50, Issue 7, Pages 1882-1900

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10910-012-0009-7

Keywords

Information theory; Statistical complexity; Chemical reactions; Molecular structure

Funding

  1. CONACyT [CB-2009-01-132224]
  2. PIFI
  3. PROMEP-SEP
  4. Junta de Andalucia [FIS2011-24540, FQM-4643, P06-FQM-2445]
  5. Andalusian research group [FQM-020, FQM-0207]
  6. Ministerio de Educacion of Spain [SAB2009-0120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We investigate the complexity of the hydrogenic identity S(N)2 exchange reaction by means of information-theoretic functionals such as disequilibrium (D), exponential entropy (L), Fisher information (I), power entropy (J) and joint information-theoretic measures, i.e., the I-D, D-L and I-J planes and the Fisher-Shannon (FS) and Lopez-Mancini-Calbet (LMC) shape complexities. The several information-theoretic measures of the one-particle density were computed in position (r) and momentum (p) spaces. The analysis revealed that the chemically significant regions of this reaction can be identified through most of the information-theoretic functionals or planes, not only the ones which are commonly revealed by the energy, such as the reactant/product (R/P) and the transition state (TS), but also those that are not present in the energy profile such as the bond cleavage energy region (BCER), the bond breaking/forming regions (B-B/F) and the charge transfer process (CT). The analysis of the complexities shows that the energy profile of the identity S(N)2 exchange reaction bears no simple behavior with respect to the LMC and FS measures. Most of the chemical features of interest (BCER, B-B/ F and CT) are only revealed when particular information-theoretic aspects of localizability (L or J), uniformity (D) and disorder (I) are considered.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available